This case is quite interesting because if the defense tries to state that KC "may" have been out searching, the prosecution has all of her cell records which quite accurately track her movements. And equally damaging is the record of her texts during the 31 days. From these records it is so very painfully obvious that KC didn't have one thought about looking for her daughter. So of all the poor sod defenses they may use, she "may" have been out looking is among the worst. Too bad this evidence wasn't available for the OJ trial, it likely would have brought a different verdict.
If Caylee had been taken by some stranger, KC gave no indication of it. Her only concerns were how many people she could draw over to Fusion. This is not the action of a mother who's daughter has been kidnapped. When tied to the evidence found with the body, the blanket taken from KC's house, the trash bags, the duct tape, the stickies taken from the very sheet of stickies found in kc's home. It eliminates the stranger entering the house, sod. And her friends, parents all have been accounted for.
There just isn't any evidence, no matter how small, pointing away from KC and toward any other person. It would seem to make an sod defense impossible. Now, if kc or Jb are insisting on an sod defense, that would explain the presence of AL. She isn't great at getting people off, but is very good at keeping them off death row. This to me screams, jb doesn't think he can win this case and is looking to limit the damage.
To make matters worse, kc's parents are not visiting. This does not look good, no matter the paper thin excuse, it just flat makes it look like they think she is guilty.