Missouri Mule
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2006
- Messages
- 2,490
- Reaction score
- 1,572
Well, I thought it was interesting that you first brought up the parking lot theory and then when it comes to fruition and appears on television, the detective says it is debunked (without any proof), you were so quick to jump into the fray against Ken. In effect you seem to be debunking your own first thoughts. Kenny is an easy target because he claims to have visions and insights the rest of us don't have. And most people don't believe in pschics and visions. Nor do I. I don't believe in visions and psychics nor have I ever been enthusiastic about the parking lot scenario. I'm also not religious but agnostic.miles_draken said:I was not as informed at the time about the time discrepancy on this parking lot area. I've heard about this in rumor for some time that they may be in the area of the home, dead and buried. When all this vision stuff came up, and incase you haven't guessed by now I don't believe it, it tainted my view of these peoples involvement with the case. This same group came up with the ground penetrating radar info and as soon as these two things were lined up I began to think against it. I'm for digging it up, putting it to rest, seeing what causes those anomolous readings. I'm completely against any visions that provide these vague things. The website you are trying to get me to post on is the same website I first read about the psychic vision, so I really have no interest in getting involved with it. I've read the whole thing and just don't agree with that method of investigation.
I'm not "trying" to get you to post to that website. I have no financial stake or other interest it. Since you referred to it in a subsequent post. On 10/20/04 you said this and you posted the link:
"Just found an interesting link about the SPringfield three."
http://airalex.homestead.com/MISSING.html
So I thought you must have found it interesting as well since those were your own words. Whether you want to participate is of course your own business. It's a free country but since you appear to have an interest in this case I thought you might want to avail yourself of some new thinking on the subject. That's all. Sorry if I misread your intentions. But there are 804 posts over there including four by the brother of Suzie Streeter. That's why I participate over there as we are, what do they say, "thinking outside the box."
For anyone else that is interested they are actually compiling a petition on this case to take it to the state or federal government level. Currently there are some 78 names on the petition. If the Springfield police won't act on tips, for whatever reason, then concerned citizens have every right to have redress for their grievances. It's actually in our Constitution; our First Amendment.