I had my conversation with the MHP officer at the headquarters and filed a report on or about November, 1992 shortly after I had my "situation" with the detective at the SPD when I reported the van I saw. Now whether or not the MHP bowed out at their own discretion or whether they were asked to eliminate their participation I cannot say. What I can say is what I was told and that was plainly that their services were not needed. As I said, it could have been misinterpreted, misstated, or my memory could be faulty although I don't believe that to be the case.
Why did I go to the MHP office that evening on Kearney Street? It was because the extremely hostile reception that I had received at the SPD by this officer. All I was doing was reporting what I had seen and knowing vehicles as I did, I knew it was an identical van. In the early morning it appeared to be newly painted. That would have been about 7:40 AM that morning. The REASON I went to the MHP was because I knew I could not fight city hall so to speak. I also wanted for word to get back to the SPD that I had reported it. However, when asked if I wanted the MHP to take it up with the SPD, I declined but I strongly suspected that it was reported which was my intended purpose. And also, as I did, the officer at the MHP, stated to me that he could not understand why this incident had even happened. Subsequently I made a rather complete written e-mail report years later to the SPD to which I was advised it would be looked at. I have not to this date received any kind of reply. Had I not already had made arrangements to attend an auto race in Nashville, TN that weekend I would have taken up this matter with Internal Affairs. I actually called the morning of my departure to make a verbal report but they had not yet arrived at the office. So it did not proceed further due to time constraints.
I have digressed to explain how and why I went to the MHP headquarters. I felt I had no alternative considering my prior experience in making my report based on my own eyewitness experience. To this date I have no idea why it was greeted in this fashion. And I invite the SPD to rebut this incident.
Did or did not the MHP work this case actively in consort with the SPD? Perhaps a representative of that state department would consent to make that clear. Based on my single discussion with this officer, I would have to say they were not working on the case at the behest of the SPD.[/quote]
Well that is fine, but like most things in this case, I cannot take someones word as fact. If someone from the MHP were to come forward and it explain the timeline, then I would believe that. Short of that all we have is what is in print, and from what I have seen, they were involved to some degree all along. There was a general winding down of the intensity to this thing, maybe that is when you spoke to them. Eventually as a case goes cold all the resources arent needed.