It sure seems like Patrick ONeil has some things he needs to answer for. I hope someone starts asking him questions.
O'Reilly asked if he knew what they're report was going to say and Dr. Baden replied that he pretty much knew what was going to be reported. O'Reilly asked him if he thought there'd be an indictment and Dr. Baden said yes.
---------------Patrick ONeil had to apologize to Dr. Scott Denton since investigators misrepresented his findings (i.e., lied) during the inquest on Riley Fox. IMHO, they can be VERY aggressive to get the result they want from an inquest. Obviously, they wanted to downplay Kathleen S. death at the time of her murder and got the results they wanted ... a free and clear Drew Peterson.
While I know this is true, I'm still gobsmacked by it. One would hope that they would still have a line that they would draw as far as to what extent the coverage would go, but obviously that is not the case.---------------
Yeah, Drew had his own personal angels looking out for him. This proves that there is definitely a thin blue line and blue will cover blue.
From mysteriew's link:
"If you believe Long's story, that he's an innocent man, who had no reason to kill David Henker, then how do you explain the bruises found on his neck? During trial, Dr. Shaku Teas, a pathologist who testified on behalf on Long, cast blame directly at the feet of Dr. Mitchell. She stated his autopsy procedure were faulty and his conclusions were incorrect. She concluded Henker died as a result of alcohol poisoning, and in her opinion, the manner in which Dr. Mitchell performed Henker's autopsy actually created those bruises on his neck." (italics mine) Oooookay that's a pretty big discrepency here!