Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity
How do you all think this would have played out if there was no video or any evidence of her rape? Consider a scenario in which SP had just run away and was found at a truck stop or something, tells the FBI she ran away because her stepdad is a rapist creep, CPS is called in, they can't find anything wrong and then what? Her only chance may have been to start standing up to him, risking physical abuse, or possibly killing herself or her parents. Maybe, in some perfect wonderful world, she would have called 911 instead and hoped for the best, but I doubt that RP would be in jail right now.
It is weird for BR to be playing Roblox and living in his mom's basement, I can agree. He comes off as a bit of a high functioning asperger to me or a person with some other impairments, not remotely like the guy in JC's case. Until he is charged with kidnapping or any sexual or predatory crime, I don't think the derogatory slamming of him is appropriate and am little shocked at how quickly so many of you are willing to tear him down and let him distract you from the real perp here, which is Randy Pruitt. BR's arrest appears largely to be a technical and cautionary one, because he did (knowingly) break a cut and clear law by having SP send him that video. What he really should have done was asked her to keep it on her phone and ensure it did not get transmitted anywhere else or shown to anyone but LE, then brought her to the FBI asap.
The media has cleverly omitted any part of the text convo that puts BR in a better light. Like:
"Unless you can prove what he did they will just release you back to him if we get caught."
You all know that is a valid concern. Especially reading these forums and how well CPS operates.
Why didn't he or his mom call authorities? That is the main question he is accountable for. SP was found hiding in his closet - for all we know she begged him not to call anyone because she was scared or not ready (not an excuse of course). He knew he would be in trouble and we don't actually have ANY facts as to what motivated him to help her. No matter what we think of BR, the bottom line is that if it were not for his involvement, she would not be safe now.
None of us would have handled it the way BR did, but you have to consider the perspective, problem solving capacity and tools of the person acting before judging the action. I honestly believe he thought he was doing the right thing by her but unfortunately has a misunderstanding and mistrust of authority. I'm going to be sitting on my hands from here on out until we learn the full story or hear from SP herself. In parting I'll say I hope RP rots in prison and those other little girls were spared.
Thank you! I'm thinking something similar!!!
(sorry in advance for the long post)
Call me Pollyanna but I’m also so hoping that SP was not victimized again by this guy. I’ve seen no indication that she was assaulted by him. “Sexual Exploitation” is referring to the prompting to take the video. There is the additional charge of “transporting across state line for sexual reasons” (paraphrasing) but that’s a speculative charge, right? And could be in relation to transporting the video/pictures across state lines. (Any lawyers reading that could clarify?)
The lay-out of the house would lead us to believe that it would be nearly impossible for BR’s mother to not know she was in the house for at least some of the 17 days, right?
LE first arrived at the home at 4:00pm (spoke to BR) and returned at 8:00pm (spoke to BR's mom). Could she have been at work at 4:00 and had arrived home by 8:00? Wonder what it was like in those 4 hours in that house? Or at least until mom arrived home, and maybe after. They (SP & BR) knew this is where the *advertiser censored* hits the fan. They may not have known at this point (4:00pm) that RP had been arrested. (what time did the news/Internet report that RP was picked up and was it local [TN] or national news?) “What’s the plan now? The cops are onto us.” I’d die to know what conversations were taking place. He couldn’t risk taking her out of the house at 4:00pm, could he? He may have thought that LE had him under surveillance. Plus, neighbors would catch their first glimpse of SP (neighbors would be arriving home from work and school during that time). I think that if he was scared that he would be charged with any type of assault, he would have made a run for it (either with SP or alone) after it turned dark - say 6:00pm or so? Mom may not have known LE showed up at 4:00. Surely, she would have called them then, right? Or, maybe she did and that was the “tip” that brought the *exigent need to return and search at 8:00pm.
They must have taken SP to the hospital to have her checked out, right? It would be negligence if they didn’t. Would they have performed a rape kit if she admitted to anything going on with BR? If so, would the charges be different and/or more? At the very least, they would have discovered recent activity. DNA may not be back yet as to who else’s DNA was collected, if any. LE could be awaiting this to add more charges.
This scenario would assume that mom knew, supported her son’s activities (even if scared and/or after the fact), was involved with helping SP stay safe and kept her mouth shut. But then there’s the pesky little detail that mom would have had to have trusted her son to NOT be acting nefariously with SP while she was away from the house. Perhaps SP was a guest in an upstairs bedroom? Perhaps she was only in the basement closet because she fled there to hide when LE came calling a second time? Perhaps he is gay and mom knew he wouldn’t harm her? If mom knew and thought that what was going on was altruistic, she could have been assisting. If not, she would have been arrested too, right? Mom has not been arrested yet, that we know of.
*I’m worried that the exigent circumstances to search the house won’t hold up in court
UNLESS MOM WAS THE “TIP”. LE had 4 hours to present before a judge to obtain a search warrant. When they didn’t/couldn’t get that warrant, they returned, claiming exigency even though they had strong circumstantial evidence that she was there for a while [“
FBI agents acting on the digital evidence and a tip……”
From chatroom to rape video: Court records detail Madisonville girl's abduction, abuse], since around 1/25 when they had access to “2,000 pages of phone and SM data”. I don’t think they had any evidence AT THAT TIME (4:00pm or 8:00pm) that she was in danger/was being mistreated or a search warrant would have been easy to get.
ALL MHO