MsMarple
Member since 2013
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2013
- Messages
- 12,179
- Reaction score
- 75,967
Starting around 14:20 Dr. Phil says he believes the parents did not harm/hurt Summer:
14:22
well let me tell you what i think and i
14:24
like say i've done this a lot and
14:27
i trained as a forensic psychologist
14:29
looking
14:30
psychology in the law and the forensics
14:32
involved with
14:34
with human behavior and conduct
14:37
and based on the timeline and the
14:39
factors here
14:40
it's very clear to me
14:43
based on the facts that neither one of
14:45
you
14:46
did anything to hurt your daughter
14:50
that's very clear to me so can we
14:52
do are you understand that i understand
14:54
that
14:55
and you understand that initially the
14:57
first thing they do is look at the
15:00
if it's the husband that goes missing or
15:03
gets killed they look at this the spouse
15:05
if it's the wife that goes missing they
15:07
look at the husband
15:08
because statistically
15:10
oftentimes that's who it is again
15:13
because of access right opportunity
15:15
motive means all of that they look at
15:17
the spouse and so when a child something
15:20
happens to a child
15:21
parents are the ones that control the
15:23
child so that's the first place they
15:24
look yes sir and when i first studied
15:27
this case the first thing i looked at
15:29
was okay
15:31
what would what would be the opportunity
15:34
for the father and the mother and i
15:36
looked at that not knowing you all at
15:37
all just to look at it
15:39
and given the timeline
15:42
there's no way
15:44
that either one of y'all
15:46
did harm to your daughter and
15:50
i hate to even say these words killed
15:52
your daughter
...continues
14:22
well let me tell you what i think and i
14:24
like say i've done this a lot and
14:27
i trained as a forensic psychologist
14:29
looking
14:30
psychology in the law and the forensics
14:32
involved with
14:34
with human behavior and conduct
14:37
and based on the timeline and the
14:39
factors here
14:40
it's very clear to me
14:43
based on the facts that neither one of
14:45
you
14:46
did anything to hurt your daughter
14:50
that's very clear to me so can we
14:52
do are you understand that i understand
14:54
that
14:55
and you understand that initially the
14:57
first thing they do is look at the
15:00
if it's the husband that goes missing or
15:03
gets killed they look at this the spouse
15:05
if it's the wife that goes missing they
15:07
look at the husband
15:08
because statistically
15:10
oftentimes that's who it is again
15:13
because of access right opportunity
15:15
motive means all of that they look at
15:17
the spouse and so when a child something
15:20
happens to a child
15:21
parents are the ones that control the
15:23
child so that's the first place they
15:24
look yes sir and when i first studied
15:27
this case the first thing i looked at
15:29
was okay
15:31
what would what would be the opportunity
15:34
for the father and the mother and i
15:36
looked at that not knowing you all at
15:37
all just to look at it
15:39
and given the timeline
15:42
there's no way
15:44
that either one of y'all
15:46
did harm to your daughter and
15:50
i hate to even say these words killed
15:52
your daughter
...continues