:cow::cow::cow:
I believe the SA did a great job in their Opening Statement and carefully laid out the "31 Days" ... and then led up to the 9-1-1 calls ...
I believe the SA did a great job with the experts, especially Dr. G and Dr. Vass ... and a great job with the witnesses ...
And I believe the SA did a great job bringing in ALL the EVIDENCE from all the experts ...
:waitasec: But ... when the SA said that they would be concluding their case in the next day or two, I thought WHOA -- it can't be over already ?
There is something that is missing and there is something that has NOT been CONNECTED by the SA -- at least for me. I know we haven't heard the Closing Statement yet ...
Look ... I totally believe ICA murdered her daughter, and I believe it was pre-meditated (computer searches and chloroform) ... And I believe ICA should get at least LWOP or the DP ...
But in "My Opinion" ... something is missing ... hopefully they will get to it in the Closing ...
I guess I am waiting for a BIG "BOMBSHELL" from the SA . . .
I actually think what the State is doing is brilliant.
The State no longer has to prove that Caylee died on June 16th, 2008. According to the defense, it is an undisputed fact that Caylee died on June 16th, 2008. The State no longer has to prove that Casey was present at the scene of death. The defense has conceeded that Casey was present at the time of Caylee's death.
That was huge for the State's case and it cut a lot out of what they would have to prove. If you rewatch Jose's opening statement, you can see the smile on Jeff Ashton's face as Jose placed Casey at the scene when Caylee died. That Casey was no longer disputing the fact that she was there at the time of death.
The State has, imo, proven that Caylee was decomposing in the trunk of Casey's car. The defense has been trying desperately to dispute this... which means that Casey is not admitting that Caylee was in the trunk of her car. It is now up to the defense to prove to the jury that Casey was not the person who placed Caylee in the trunk of that car... which would have had to have been very shortly after death as Caylee was in the trunk during the early stages of decomposition. Someone had to have had taken Caylee and placed her in the trunk of that car without Casey knowing about it... and then removed her without Casey knowing about it.
I know people are going to say... wait... the defense doesn't have to prove anything... well, yes they do. Now that they have claimed that Casey knew about Caylee's death and claim that George is the one who covered it up... they have placed themselves in the position to prove that this is what happened. The jury is just not going to take their word for it.
I could go on and on. The fact remains, it is now up to the defense to disprove all the evidence against Casey and make it fit in with their own theory of what happened.
I must say that I am very excited to see where the defense is going with all of this and if they are as <unusual> as I really believe they are?? I am equally excited in seeing what the State does to completely destroy anything the defense presents once they can call rebuttal witnesses. The defense has backed themselves into a very tight corner with very little wiggle room. The opening statement made Casey out to be an even bigger monster than I gave her credit for... let's see if the defense can bring that back into the forefront.