Linda7NJ
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2005
- Messages
- 32,110
- Reaction score
- 8,279
Oh yeah ... Producers at HLN and some flunkies that work for the defense team trolling social media sites every night.
No doubt in my mind.
It was brought up during the Orlando Creatures trial that Baez & company had a team of flunkies going thru all the trial watcher forums and other social media sites (tweets, etc) nightly.
To get reviews on what "John Q Public" was thinking of their daily performances.
Then, perhaps tailor the course of their attention depending on what people were saying.
Sooooo agree with you that the defense team look foolish coordinating their outfits each day.
It's so obvious - jury must see it too.
It's an old trial trick to dress the defendant in a style that might be sympathetic to a jury.
I can see covering a gang tattoo and stuff like that ... Makes good sense.
I've watched trials where they dress a 30+ woman up in shirts with PeterPan
collars and knee socks ... To make her look young, innocent - ergo incapable of committing such heinous crimes.
This jury must be wise to these old tricks too.
This case is beyond the pale though.
The matchy-matchy outfits every day look ridiculous.
Like jr high school girls talking the night before to decide what to wear to school the next day.
Gimme a break. Jurors are wise to this baloney.
Dressing JA up each day in a carbon copy of Willmotts outfit - does NOT fool anyone into suddenly thinking "oh look at that defendant, she dresses like a professional attorney, no way she could murder anyone"
Really Willmott?
Same idea with the chair lowering of JA's chair ... To make her appear small, meek, and innocent.
I've actually seen Websleuths pulled up on a laptop at the defense table during the Casey Anthony trial..