Why would premeditation be off the table because of the eyeball reflection photo? All it does is show that at that moment JA was taking a photo of Travis in the shower and apparently not holding a gun or knife on him. The prosecution has never once believed that he was aware at that time of any upcoming assault and that it was in fact a surprise attack soon after that photo was taken. The knife could have been hidden anywhere in that bathroom from JA to grab and surprise attack him with it between the time that photo of his face was taken and the attack started. That was a much longer period of time, by the way, than the defense said that he lunged for her, body slammed her, wrestled with her on the floor, she ran to the closet, lunged up the shelves to grab a non-existent gun off the back of the top shelf that may or may not have been in a non-estistent holdster, and run back to the bathroom to shoot him.
Of course JM would stipulate that in that eyeball photo she wasn't holding a gun or knife on him because it has never been the prosecution's theory that she was. Their theory has always been that she had the knife hidden near by and that sometime between that photo of his face and the bathroom ceiling photo she grabbed the knife and surprise attacked him with it. The prosecution's theory has nothing at all to do with premeditation. Premeditated murders happen every day where the murder was planned in advance of the killing where the victim was surprise attacked by a hidden or concealed weapon. The prosecution has never believed that at the time the photo of Travis's face was taken that there was a weapon held on him or that he was aware that an attack was imminent. That has only been strange speculation here and now apparently by the defense. It means nothing and does nothing to change the prosecution's theory of what occurred because the prosecution has never believed that at the time that photo was taken JA was holding him at knife or gun point.