So, was the third possible bat mark to be applied to the first 3 bangs or the second set of bangs bracketed? ......bang...(bang,bang,bang)?
This is where I am confused by the order of events in defence case. If shots were first as they say and Oscar was screaming, then 3 shots first doesn't correlate to 4 shots being fired?
We have heard witness statements that say they heard 3 then 3 bangs or 3 then four bangs? Four shots were fired so one of these sound sequences must indicate four shots and I would imagine they where in line with each other not bang (1 x gun shot) cricket bat x2 then 2 more gun shots, followed by 2 more bat shots? All the while Oscar is screaming?
Again what caused the damage to panel and the noise it would have created?
I don't think this is necessarily a defence win...as it just doesn't add up