Gryffindor
Former Member
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2014
- Messages
- 646
- Reaction score
- 0
And it was Reeva's habit to lock herself in when intruder scenarios occurred.
N: You cannot get away with this time and time again, pretending that you didn't follow...
Common sense varies.
Fight or flight is an innate response to each individual.
Nel cannot determine categorically what an individual person would or wouldn't do in such circumstances.
And it was Reeva's habit to lock herself in when intruder scenarios occurred.
Perhaps all those who think OP is "innocent" of knowing it was Reeva would consider the following:
Reeva's bladder was just about empty when she died.
By his own statement, OP spoke to her just before getting up and moving the fans.
He then heard a noise - the window opening. (heard despite the fans).
Grabbed his gun - no time to think - whispered to Reeva, then hurtled down passage screaming, then stopped screaming, heard toilet door slamming, slowed down and went into bathroom quietly.
Heard a noise he perceived as somebody coming out of the toilet and plugged the door with four shots.
So at what time did she actually have a chance to pee?
If the door opened outwards, she could not have reached it to pull it shut if she'd been sitting down on the toilet.
She would not have had time to pee beforehand, and if she had done and had time to flush, he would have heard the flush and/or the cistern refilling.
If she had peed, then stood up and pulled up her shorts, but not flushed, there would have been evidence in the toilet (toilet paper).
But if he heard the window sliding open (which presumably was Reeva in his version), there would not have been time for her to pee AT ALL.
So, if her bladder was empty, why would she have got up in the night and gone to the toilet at all?
Just looking logically at all the above, it makes complete sense that his version is a total and utter fabrication.
I think this is the first time I've heard it stated clearly that the state's case is, Reeva was standing up, facing the bathroom door and talking to Oscar when he shot her?
Blaming Reeva again .. "I wish she had screamed, I wish she had let me know"
I think this is the first time I've heard it stated clearly that the state's case is, Reeva was standing up, facing the bathroom door and talking to Oscar when he shot her?
Well that is not the same as definitively saying that he heard the door opening.
I don't agree that's been established. We've heard Reeva was victim to an intruder by testimony from one person - Oscar. I'd really like Reeva's mother to testify on that since she was actually there.And it was Reeva's habit to lock herself in when intruder scenarios occurred.
I'm thinking his dog is one lucky pooch.
For reals?? I also wish she had screamed out, and I'm in NO way blaming her for what happened. I totally understand why she didn't... even though no one else appears to.
I think the disbelief is that, by his own account, Oscar was screaming and shouting. If he was screaming and shouting why wouldn't she say anything at all?For reals?? I also wish she had screamed out, and I'm in NO way blaming her for what happened. I totally understand why she didn't... even though no one else appears to.
Nel is wrong. OP said on direct that he heard a noise that he thought was someone coming out of toilet. This is not something he's never said before and I could see the defense getting all worked up looking for the document. Perhaps Nel wanted the adjournment before they could object.
He did follow it up by saying he was screaming at Reeva to call the police.
For reals?? I also wish she had screamed out, and I'm in NO way blaming her for what happened. I totally understand why she didn't... even though no one else appears to.
Nel is still wrong. He might have just forgotten OP saying this but he's still incorrect when he says OP never mentioned that before when he has.
Heaven forbid the best defence team money could buy made his story fit, well I never.