Apologies if someone has answered this - I am making my way through in an orderly 'nicely typed' manner.
She works for CNN - at some point in the last few years she did a profile on Pistorius back when many people admired him, interviewing him in his home etc so to an extent, she 'knows' him and I think is sympathetic to him. Since she's the journo, more concerning to me is Kelly Phelps, their legal analyst who is often consulted during Curnow's reports. She is totally for the defence, something a few South African posters here have commented on. Totally, as in I have never heard her concede anything for the state but always finds a way to spin it for Pistorius. Especially laughable was yesterday's report where she said that the defence's neighbour's testimony swept away the state's version while never once mentioning that all of them testified to events after the shooting and the state has never claimed OP was not distraught then. And, unlike every other SA legal expert I''ve seen in the last 24-hours, claimed that Nel spent little time on cross as he couldn't 'poke holes' in their testimony - all the others say he doesn't really care because of that post-shooting factor. This is her, though it's not one of her 'better' ones - post-Dixon was especially 'surreal' shall we say:
Pistorius trial resumes after break - YouTube
And this is another interesting chat:
on time wasting and Oscar's emotional state. - YouTube