Can anyone summarize the salient/important points of that last witnesses' testimony? I am afraid I didn't quite grasp what they were.
Why is it so important for defence to have Reeva's splinter wounds matching splinter patterns on the door?
they certainly don't want a gap between the four shots. so no
bang...bangbangbang
i.e. don't want any notion of the hip shot first, followed by a re-aiming of the gun.
two shots close to the door makes the four quick shots a possibility. the guy has still to explain the missed shot though. although i guess it could have come first, third, or last using his version.