Kittymama
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 29, 2009
- Messages
- 481
- Reaction score
- 308
- the fact that he fits the profile of a child sex killer to the letter
- the fact that he took an 8 year old blonde haired blue eyed girl to a rural field 1.5 hours from her home
- the fact that she was found naked from waste down
- THEN add in what TLM said about, masturbation, you know I am going to have sex with her.
- the fact that his own defense could not offer one bit of evidence to clear him such as the hammer or other things tossed away, or the car seat that could proove him innocent if he didn't do anything. It may not be defense responsibility to proove his innocence but I SURE WOULD DO IT if it would clear me.
-common sense (why DOES a 28 year old man have to explain why he had an 8 year old girl in his car, and took her to a rural field, who then ends up dead with no pants on) it is common sense to me why that is in light of the fact that the defendant can't offer up anything for a defense.
IMO it is a no brainer. MOO
MOO
OMG, how could I forget the part where she was found naked from the waist down!? And yeah, he did fit the profile of a child sex killer almost exactly. I totally agree with your additions.