That's interesting. A local searcher found Caylee.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And we all know how that turned out in terms of prosecution.
That's interesting. A local searcher found Caylee.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And we all know how that turned out in terms of prosecution.
respectfully, we don't know that. I've searched and searched and the only one saying dad didn't have to take a poly was dad. He said he asked and they told him no, he wouldn't need to. As far as LE - they haven't said one way or the other on who took one or who didn't and what the results were.Hi Paige- LE did not do a Poly on him because they confirmed his whereabouts (work) and have not yet made him a focal point. Cheers! L
Hi Paige- LE did not do a Poly on him because they confirmed his whereabouts (work) and have not yet made him a focal point. Cheers! L
Yes, recent revelations caused a move - the first one - in my vaunted "chance the answer lies inside the home" percentage-o-meter, which had been set at 60-40 based merely on historical likelihood. Not a wild swing, but it's at 65-35 now.
Innocent until proven guilty. No matter the numbers.
That's interesting. A local searcher found Caylee.
Yes, recent revelations caused a move - the first one - in my vaunted "chance the answer lies inside the home" percentage-o-meter, which had been set at 60-40 based merely on historical likelihood. Not a wild swing, but it's at 65-35 now.
Innocent until proven guilty. No matter the numbers.
snip-snipI see it differently:
"Innocent until proven guilty" only applies within the courtroom itself, and is part of jury instructions.
snip-snip
Granted and your opinion respected and it's true that the "innocent until proven guilty" construct does not go all the way back to, say, my beloved Magna Carta. But to say that concept "only applies within the courtroom itself" I can't agree with. It's something I think might be in the heart of every freedom-loving American, whether serving on a jury or not, "innocent until proven guilty": a way of life.
But it's all trumped by the First Amendment, and the necessity to solve crimes.
"Innocent until proven guilty", if applied to all, would apply to prosecutorial efforts, also.
Although he had no clues, one neighbor reportedly told police about seeing an African-American individual carrying a baby up the street around midnight, only hours before Lisa, (whose birthday on Nov. 11 would now make her 11 months old) was reported missing.
Read more: http://www.kansascity.com/2011/10/14/3208365/neighborhoods-trust-stability.html#ixzz1atkau6Jn
Well, one thing we do know now...that ain't Jersey. :floorlaugh:
I see it differently:
"Innocent until proven guilty" only applies within the courtroom itself, and is part of jury instructions.
If everyone was considered "innocent", no one would ever be charged with a crime. The phrase is interesting on another level: there's no court finding of "innocent" -- only "guilty" and "not guilty". That's a signal that no one's ever "proven innocent" in the courts; only that the evidence itself speaks one way. Otherwise, OJ would have been "innocent".
The amount of information coming out of DB's mouth, dribs at a time, tells me that she's soon to spill the beans.
are my fence-sitters still out there? :fence: i'm still in my same spot. patiently waiting for evidence! :seeya:
are my fence-sitters still out there? :fence: i'm still in my same spot. patiently waiting for evidence! :seeya:
are my fence-sitters still out there? :fence: i'm still in my same spot. patiently waiting for evidence! :seeya: