Mr Jim, I do know ONE good cop who is a nice honorable man! Although he is not in Dallas CoIs there anyone here that just wants to sleuth the case and discuss its merits instead of turning this thread into a cop-bashing forum?????
Mr Jim, I do know ONE good cop who is a nice honorable man! Although he is not in Dallas CoIs there anyone here that just wants to sleuth the case and discuss its merits instead of turning this thread into a cop-bashing forum?????
Can anyone see that there is a shot of AG's door? There is a rather tall pot plant on the left. And of course the doormat is totally different.
Or is there anyone here who thinks that Cops should face justice when they screw up and kill people?
This entire situation, has been an epiphany for me. I was cynical and jaded, from my Ivory Tower, looking down on people who were in trouble with the law.
"They must have done something, after all, police don't just hassle people for no reason.". I was extremely judgmental.
Here was a young man, in his home, shot down, for no reason at all. He was criminalized, his home searched, while his killer did not have her home searched. His killer was not arrested the night of his murder.
There is a problem here.
And THAT says she was “confronted” by Mr Jean. Interesting!!
No, that isn't a POT PLANT next to AG's door. It appears to be a POTTED PLANT and hard to tell if it is fake or live. Mother-in-laws tongue or something in that plant family, not cannabis. I looked at this video again having a hard time believing I would have missed a pot plant growing by her door.
Duuuude. Right. Worded so incorrectly.Well if this just isn’t a kick in the teeth.
Pretty sure it should read “he was confronted by the rogue cop”
Oh dear. Translation problem. I am from Australia, where pot plant = potted plant. See example:No, that isn't a POT PLANT next to AG's door. It appears to be a POTTED PLANT and hard to tell if it is fake or live. Mother-in-laws tongue or something in that plant family, not cannabis. I looked at this video again having a hard time believing I would have missed a pot plant growing by her door.
Or anything the DPD who are supporting her says.Since she clearly lied about the door being ajar, I don’t feel obligated to believe anything she says.
Everything you said.Duuuude. Right. Worded so incorrectly.
Manslaughter is the wrong charge!
She was reckless by going into his apartment and making her “mistake” yes. Got it.
She INTENTIONALLY shot him. She did do that on purpose.
If she is charged with manslaughter why shouldn’t anyone else who is able to say they made a mistake when they shot someone or wrong person or wrong house or didn’t “realize” something about the situation be able to be charged with manslaughter instead?
She shot him on purpose. He died. That’s murder.
Well if this just isn’t a kick in the teeth.
Pretty sure it should read “he was confronted by the rogue cop”
Since she clearly lied about the door being ajar, I don’t feel obligated to believe anything she says.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.me...fighters-were-misled-about-who-fired-gun/amp/
“An arrest warrant affidavit for Guyger, 30, a four-year veteran of the department, alleges that she immediately called 911 after she shot Botham Jean once in the torso in his apartment at 9:59 p.m., mortally wounding him. What is unclear is how the call for medical help just three minutes later misidentified the shooter as a security guard.”
Some sort of audio on the link
Nancy Grace’s podcast just said that AG had a 15 hour work shift.
So we’re back to that.
Duuuude. Right. Worded so incorrectly.
Manslaughter is the wrong charge!
She was reckless by going into his apartment and making her “mistake” yes. Got it.
She INTENTIONALLY shot him. She did do that on purpose.
If she is charged with manslaughter why shouldn’t anyone else who is able to say they made a mistake when they shot someone or wrong person or wrong house or didn’t “realize” something about the situation be able to be charged with manslaughter instead?
She shot him on purpose. He died. That’s murder.