The only part of the call that has ever been released by law enforcement was released to Brandon's father. It is not the entire call. It is not even a consistent thread of the call. It is a collection of snippets that were pieced together and given to Brandon's dad for voice identification purposes only. Ladessa obtained a copy of the recording by making a recording of the recording that had been given to Brandon's dad. Supposedly she made her recording using her cell phone. So there's never been a clean, clear, entire, untainted version of this call released. The public doesn't know the entirety of what was said in this call because it's not the entire call. Never has been. And it's still an open case so there's no getting a copy of it under the FOIA. In Texas, there are specific limitations on 911 calls under the FOIA as it is. Hope this helps in understanding some of what you may hear on the YouTube recording. Since the YouTube version, and all other public versions except for the one given to Brandon's father, are recordings of a recording, I don't know that one can really put much faith into background noise, etc. My opinion on that part.ah sure! it seems like a hassle but it's worth it, as you can vary speeds and change audio settings. So, download VLC Player online. Then open it, select "Open Network" in the menu, paste in the URL to the 911 call on YouTube, and there you have it. It really does make a difference when listening to the call.
I've read elsewhere that the call would have definitely been edited, and that LL had been told this by the police? Can anyone confirm that? Supposedly as it may have been part of a murder investigation, nothing can be released that would sway a jury if it went to trial..? But as it's now technically a cold case, I wonder if we'll be able to hear the full version... (if, of course, it was edited at all).
The only part of the call that has ever been released by law enforcement was released to Brandon's father. It is not the entire call. It is not even a consistent thread of the call. It is a collection of snippets that were pieced together and given to Brandon's dad for voice identification purposes only. Ladessa obtained a copy of the recording by making a recording of the recording that had been given to Brandon's dad. Supposedly she made her recording using her cell phone. So there's never been a clean, clear, entire, untainted version of this call released. The public doesn't know the entirety of what was said in this call because it's not the entire call. Never has been. And it's still an open case so there's no getting a copy of it under the FOIA. In Texas, there are specific limitations on 911 calls under the FOIA as it is. Hope this helps in understanding some of what you may hear on the YouTube recording. Since the YouTube version, and all other public versions except for the one given to Brandon's father, are recordings of a recording, I don't know that one can really put much faith into background noise, etc. My opinion on that part.
Actually a lot of people know this. This is one of the examples of some of us who have followed the case since the beginning and have a lot of knowledge about things. Several of us stopped posting for a while because of hostility. We've been cussed out, threatened, you name it. There was even a WS mod that shut us down at every turn. I understand that she isn't around anymore. There was a tremendous amount of information that Ladessa posted on social media in the beginning. However, when she started to get questioned about it, it would disappear. Many of us stopped even interacting on this case because we grew tired of being harassed and attacked for having opinions and presenting ideas that were different than others. And godforbid we actually present evidence to back any of it up. I realize that we all have our own respective ideas, opinions, and conclusions. I don't know Brandon Lawson. But I know a few people like him. Regardless of his past, his father and children deserve to know what happened to him.Wow thank you! At last, some concrete info. That is incredibly useful -- how do you know this, may I ask? and why does nobody online know this?? It would certainly clear up a lot of confusion.
At what point does this become a cold case? And when that does happen, is there a possibility of hearing the unedited call?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Actually a lot of people know this. This is one of the examples of some of us who have followed the case since the beginning and have a lot of knowledge about things. Several of us spotted posting for a while because of hostility. We've been cussed out, threatened, you name it. There was even a WS mod that shut us down at every turn. I understand that she isn't around anymore. There was a tremendous amount of information that Ladessa posted on social media in the beginning. However, when she started to get questioned about it, it would disappear. Many of us stopped even interacting on this case because we grew tired of being harassed and attacked for having opinions and presenting ideas that were different than others. And godforbid we actually present evidence to back any of it up. I realize that we all have our own respective ideas, opinions, and conclusions. I don't know Brandon Lawson. But I know a few people like him. Regardless of his past, his father and children deserve to know what happened to him.
Wow thank you! At last, some concrete info. That is incredibly useful -- how do you know this, may I ask? and why does nobody online know this?? It would certainly clear up a lot of confusion.
At what point does this become a cold case? And when that does happen, is there a possibility of hearing the unedited call?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I was just thinking about that very thing. It was like, why would she bring up cold case at the time? He had just disappeared.Funny you bring up a cold case. Ladessa actually addressed this in an interview she did, questioning when it would be considered a cold case. Which to many of us who have followed the case, why would she question that?? Sorry but after lying on government papers months before BL went missing saying he wasn't in the picture, to get benefits, it's hard to believe too much she says
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Many thanks! Although I must say, having reviewed the case since the beginning and considering LL behaviour online, I'm realising that people have good cause to suspect her and K of being involved in this (without saying it explicitly).
If someone is getting away with murder, that will not stand.
Why have LE not searched the old house? I'd bet there is still something there that would break the case. Maybe in the garden?
Many thanks! Although I must say, having reviewed the case since the beginning and considering LL behaviour online, I'm realising that people have good cause to suspect her and K of being involved in this (without saying it explicitly).
If someone is getting away with murder, that will not stand.
Why have LE not searched the old house? I'd bet there is still something there that would break the case. Maybe in the garden?
Rocks mysteriously appeared in the garden read it in the other forum on the 911 call.
Do agree need some clarity of what the suspicions/connections are with the appearance of rocks