Limited resources are no excuse for failure to provide protection. CPS failed Colton.
JMO
I thought they were going to court on Tuesday but now it looks like it won't be until October 30?
Select Defendant Attorney Cause Setting Date/Time Court Floor Type Charge
WORK MEAGAN RENA DAVIS DARLA DENISE
D-1-DC-14-301864 10/30/14 09:00 167TH 8 UDS TAMP/FAB PHYS EVID W/INTENT TO IMPAIR HUM CORPSE
https://publiccourts.co.travis.tx.us/dsa/default.aspx
This story has once again dominated local talk radio.
Two things stand out:
1. As a society, young single mothers need to stop shaming other young single mothers who want to consider relinquishing their babies to adoption and
2. CPS didn't kill this precious child. His mother and her boyfriend did.
The doctor in the Wohlers case didn't order him not to be returned. He reported it to CPS. The system failed both children, 25 years apart. I really don't know why you are making such leaps in logic. Taking a photo is a lot different than physically removing a child away from a parent. The cousin didn't have custody. Nobody can do that without a court order. Not a doctor, not a cousin, nobody. A doctor can't diagnose child abuse just from looking at a photo.
JMO
The chair is named for Christopher Wohlers, a 20-month-old who was beaten to death in Austin in 1990. About a week before his death, Christopher was brought, badly beaten, to a hospital. A pediatrician told a state child abuse caseworker that the child should not go home with the family, but he was allowed to anyway.
Child Protective Services sent a notice about the suspected abuse to Austin police. It arrived the same day Christopher died.
"The system failed that child, and as it turns out, the system was failing children nationwide," Martin said.
http://www.statesman.com/news/news/local/abused-children-getting-a-voice-1/nRgN5/
1) Shaming. Interesting... could you elaborate please?
I gave my third child up for adoption 22 years ago. I was on my own with two small kids, no child support and struggling financially. No way could I have supported one more child. Honestly, it was the best option for all four of us, and the toughest decision I ever made in my life. One person suggested I go on welfare and keep it. ... Seriously!? Otherwise, I had people coming out of the woodwork wanting that baby!
I never picked up on any projected shame. How that could outweigh any other critical factors escapes me, but then again, I could see how that might play in if we are talking teen moms in high school or still highly influenced by that friend-centric mind set.
I did not go through an agency, but I did seek counseling support at Lutheran Social Services, who were willing to provide counseling for free. I did pay my midwife myself, but she had delivered my first two and was amazingly helpful and worked out special arrangements for me to pay her. I think the biggest problem is the lack of funding to support adoption as a viable alternative to abortion, especially in light of all the abortion restrictions bearing down on women in Texas. Some policy and fiscal alignment is definitely needed here.
2) CPS didn't kill Colton, no. However, the agency is negligible via inefficiency and children are dying as a result. The agency needs extreme retrofitting. Less paperwork and more family face time is needed. Again, policy and fiscal alignment would help immensely.
:twocents:
Yes. A generation ago, people saw relinquishing a baby for adoption to be what it is: a selfless act that benefits both the mother and the baby. More so the baby, because the mother grieves.
A generation ago few girls purposely got pregnant if they had no husband or at least steady boyfriend, and no means to support a family whatsoever and nowhere to live. Now, it's common. Never in the history of human society have girls with no means purposely gotten pregnant and intended to raise the baby alone and in poverty, the way you'd buy a kitten and hope all goes well.
I have some experience with childbirth classes and early parenting classes for young women at risk, and am shocked at the shaming that now goes on with girls who consider adoption. My guess is, because these girls know what they're doing is wrong, and they can't admit that the girls who are considering adoption are doing what is right.
If you're not around this situation, you could go to medical or social forums for young mothers and watch it happen online.
This is a fuzzy area, and the reason he was allowed to go home with his mother is because of a clerical omission on the part of the staff, not because the caseworker didn't intend to follow doctor's orders. It was doctor's orders for release from the hospital, the way a doc will order that a patient not drive himself home, or that a patient be able to swallow before being transferred to a rehab facility. It was a condition of his release that he not be released to his mother.
I know more about this case. I don't want to have to register as an insider, since this thread isn't even about little Christopher, and so maybe belaboring the point further is unnecessary.
1) Shaming. Interesting... could you elaborate please?
I gave my third child up for adoption 22 years ago. I was on my own with two small kids, no child support and struggling financially. No way could I have supported one more child. Honestly, it was the best option for all four of us, and the toughest decision I ever made in my life. One person suggested I go on welfare and keep it. ... Seriously!? Otherwise, I had people coming out of the woodwork wanting that baby!
I never picked up on any projected shame. How that could outweigh any other critical factors escapes me, but then again, I could see how that might play in if we are talking teen moms in high school or still highly influenced by that friend-centric mind set.
I did not go through an agency, but I did seek counseling support at Lutheran Social Services, who were willing to provide counseling for free. I did pay my midwife myself, but she had delivered my first two and was amazingly helpful and worked out special arrangements for me to pay her. I think the biggest problem is the lack of funding to support adoption as a viable alternative to abortion, especially in light of all the abortion restrictions bearing down on women in Texas. Some policy and fiscal alignment is definitely needed here.
2) CPS didn't kill Colton, no. However, the agency is negligible via inefficiency and children are dying as a result. The agency needs extreme retrofitting. Less paperwork and more family face time is needed. Again, policy and fiscal alignment would help immensely.
:twocents:
You brought up Christopher and suggested I do research so I did. And I found a media article that states facts and I linked it. Unless you have a link, I'll take the media article as fact and that it was CPS who failed the child, not the hospital clerical staff. The article clearly states CPS failed to notify police of the doctor's concerns in time to save his life.
JMO
I never said hospital clerical staff.
You can believe it, or don't. I'm not going to sit here and argue the facts with you.
The larger point - and it's true, whether you believe it or not - a doctor in a hospital facility in Texas can order the parent not to leave with the child.
And it's too bad Colton's family didn't know or believe that.
No I didn't say hospital staff. Clerical omission on the part of the staff.
[modnip].
Colton's family certainly knew where he was located when they held him for that photograph that eventually brought police to the house, months too late. They had him in their arms at that time, and apparently no mother was around to keep them from taking him to the ER. At that point, that could have been the pivotal point where a doctor would order the child into temporary care and the case could be investigated.
But they didn't. [modsnip]. My guess is, because they'd had unsuccessful experiences with CPS and had no idea how to go straight to the doctor for help.
it seems that women who have babies and cannot support them do it for a number of reasons. Sometimes it is because of being intoxicated and not thinking about consequences.
In spite of evidence to the contrary, they believe that the father of the child will stay with them and love her.
Many of these girls are looking for love and think the guy loves her. Or so she tells herself.
Many girls are looking for love and think the baby will love her.
Where I live, for a family of three, welfare is $423 month. They get a subsidized crappy apartment , maybe on the second floor . They have to haul their groceries and laundry up the stairs along with the children. Usually there is no car so they grocery shop once a month by cab and fill in the rest of the time via convenience store which is in a walking distance. Hence, weight gain because fresh foods are not going to last one month. Freezer space is limited.
No babysitters or money to go out and have some free time.
But the searching for love and the hope and belief that this time the man will be the one overrides all misery.
Everyone on earth is searching for love and acceptance. It does not matter if you are rich, poor or in between
All of the funeral expenses for Colton Turner have been covered by the community and local service providers, said Jessica McDunn, a spokeswoman for Cook-Walden Davis Funeral Home in Georgetown.
Services to honor Turner — who would have turned 3 years old on Sept. 21 — have not yet been scheduled.
http://www.statesman.com/news/news/...ay-for-colton-turners-funeral-expenses/nhQyR/
Very glad that the community came together and that Colton will have a proper funeral once his little body is released.
He was a sweet little boy full of life. He loved the great outdoors, playing in the mud and water with his daddy, and getting into things that boys do. His favorite movie was 'Planet of the Apes' and he enjoyed going to the park.
http://obits.dignitymemorial.com/dignity-memorial/obituary.aspx?n=Colton-Turner+Pelfrey&lc=4885&pid=172513385&mid=6127500
I don't believe something without a link especially when it contradicts a news story which I posted a link. [modsnip]. I view them as victims.
Have a nice day.