happyday
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2018
- Messages
- 3,135
- Reaction score
- 36,562
According to Pommy Mommy’s first post it was a 2020.Do we know what year the Acadia is? Tia.
According to Pommy Mommy’s first post it was a 2020.Do we know what year the Acadia is? Tia.
2020, I believe. I think this information was on page 1....Do we know what year the Acadia is? Tia.
—
Eta:
Hernandez's vehicle is described as a 2020 GMC Black Acadia with Texas plates MKJ 3303 with an "Aggie Mom" decal on the back of the vehicle. It remains missing as well.
2020, I believe. I think this information was on page 1....
(Omggggg, sorry (embarrassed), I’m obviously crosseyed from 24/7 on the James Chadwell and Delphi threads. Disregard, sorry about that, DUH! Crawling back into lurk/read mode.)According to Pommy Mommy’s first post it was a 2020.
Don't worry, always good to have a recap even on the little details. They sometimes get lost.(Omggggg, sorry (embarrassed), I’m obviously crosseyed from 24/7 on the James Chadwell and Delphi threads. Disregard, sorry about that, DUH! Crawling back into lurk mode).)
NOOOOO don’t go anywhere! We need you here! I had to go back to look what year and just got lucky that it was in the 1st post!(Omggggg, sorry (embarrassed), I’m obviously crosseyed from 24/7 on the James Chadwell and Delphi threads. Disregard, sorry about that, DUH (crawling back into lurk mode).)
Oh, to be known as a heavy hitter. Sigh. Maybe when I'm retired. Thanks for putting that together.rsbm
Thanks everyone for your contributions, excellent work so far, as usual. Some heavy hitters in here.![]()
OMG it is so weird that at first they said she was seen by someone she KNOWS late at night at that intersection. That was throwing me off too. Walgreens surveillance video makes way more sense, but why the misinformation? Just mistaken or deliberate? And why is the FBI involved? It’s hard enough to get even local LE to really investigate a missing adult. It’s an interesting one for sure.
Maybe the friend has asked EH in advance to text her when she arrived home, she thought the time elapsed should have been more than enough to get there, so she asked if EH was home already. We just don’t know.I keep sticking on the texting en-route. I never text and drive. I avoid texting people when I know they are driving because too many people I know are distracted by the texts, even if they aren't replying. Therefore, I find it odd that the friend hadn't asked, in advance, to text when she arrived safely. Next, if not that, wouldn't she had asked her when she was 5 minutes out? Then again, I just detest my phone, in general.
Maybe the friend has asked EH in advance to text her when she arrived home, she thought the time elapsed should have been more than enough to get there, so she asked if EH was home already. We just don’t know.
In that case I would have done the same. Sometimes people just forget to let you know they are already home.
I hope EH will be found safe and soon.
That’s possible. There’s got to be way more to this whole story. Well we do know they’re purposely holding back information so there’s definitely more!Sorry to randomly jump in before I'm finished reading the thread, but to me this implies she was with someone she knows in the car on the surveillance footage. I got the feeling that perhaps the other person(s) have not identified themselves... I could be way off though
Video shows missing mother of 3 outside sister-in-law’s house night before disappearance
This article posted at the beginning of EH’s disappearance made me think the two exchanged texts multiple times.
“Maggie was texting Erica during her drive home to make sure she made it home safe,” Eliva said. “At 3:04 a.m., Maggie texted Erica asking if she made it home yet. Erica replied that she was five mins away.”
And the statement made on the Find EH Facebook page also.
“They text back n forth on Erica's way home.”
But I may be misinterpreting it.![]()
Whether Erica was seen on cameras driving her car (or it was someone else driving it) may be the information that is being purposefully withheld.
That, and who the phone number she called belongs to.
Two weeks is too long to go with such minimal information being given out, and because of that, I think LE may have a lead, but have to play their cards close to their chest. They won't want to jeopardise anything.
If the friend texted at 3:04 and EH said not yet and the friend texted again little later to ask the same again, that’s already constitutes texting “back and fort on the way home” in my book. It doesn’t necessarily means they did it before those messages. However, that’s also stays a possibility as I wasn’t there and don’t know the truth.Video shows missing mother of 3 outside sister-in-law’s house night before disappearance
This article posted at the beginning of EH’s disappearance made me think the two exchanged texts multiple times.
“Maggie was texting Erica during her drive home to make sure she made it home safe,” Eliva said. “At 3:04 a.m., Maggie texted Erica asking if she made it home yet. Erica replied that she was five mins away.”
And the statement made on the Find EH Facebook page also.
“They text back n forth on Erica's way home.”
But I may be misinterpreting it.![]()
That’s possible. There’s got to be way more to this whole story. Well we do know they’re purposely holding back information so there’s definitely more!