UK UK- Lynda Farrow, 29, pregnant, Battered/throat slashed @ home, Woodford Green, London, March 1979

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
I've been searching unsolved murders in the 1970s and 1980s, especially those in or around London and any associated with Peter Sutcliffe, the fact that the victims of the unknown murderer in this case, have being picked out previously as possible Ripper victims, means that looking at murder victims previously believed to have been killed by Sutcliffe in the London area, yet not proved, could victims of this guy instead. I believe the fact they are unsolved yet suspected victims of Sutcliffe means there is no DNA evidence.


Elizabeth Parravincina is an extremely strong contender. Geographically, physically, age wise, glamour wise, how she was killed and the fact this was so similar and near to Lynne Weedon.

It's interesting to note that the murder of Patsy Morris has also been possibly linked when she was the childhood gf of Levi Belfield and he has long been a suspect of murdering her, he was 12 at the time, he also hated blondes and his MO with blunt force trauma matches some of these. It's almost like he was taught by the perpetrator of these crimes.

Edited for typos
Started thread..
 
The killer walked to and from the murder scene in size 9 boots with snow on the ground. He may have had size 7 feet and layered up his socks to fill size 9 boots to fool the police - it was Sutcliffe IMO
 
The killer walked to and from the murder scene in size 9 boots with snow on the ground. He may have had size 7 feet and layered up his socks to fill size 9 boots to fool the police - it was Sutcliffe IMO
"Clear set of footprints" @9:30
 
The killer walked to and from the murder scene in size 9 boots with snow on the ground. He may have had size 7 feet and layered up his socks to fill size 9 boots to fool the police - it was Sutcliffe IMO
They have PS and the killers DNA on the database, as has already been stated in past posts discussing this, if it was Sutcliffe the DNA would have matched, it didn't.
 
Very strange case. I don't think they have DNA though.
Colin Sutton has just released a new documentary, and says the police lost the exhibits.
According to the new documentary, the forensics in the case may be a palm print, rather than a DNA sample.
 
Last edited:

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
144
Guests online
517
Total visitors
661

Forum statistics

Threads
605,270
Messages
18,185,025
Members
233,289
Latest member
Bfred1221
Back
Top