There is an interesting write up on Wikinews, about background legal issues around the case. It will help give non English/ Scottish posters an insight into why total silence falls after a person is charged there.
The Scottish Justice Secretary has said he has been 'keeping a very careful eye' on Rosdeep's case, because apparently in Scotland (but not in England) no photos of an arrested person are supposed to be published, in case it taints eyewitness evidence. In other words, I think it means anyone who saw her, for example, travelling near the crime scene but then saw Rosdeep's photo in the media before identifying her to police, would be 'tainted'.
A law professor, James Chalmers, at Glasgow Uni has confirmed to Wiki that in anyone who published a photo of Rosdeep
after she was arrested but
before she appeared in court to face charges, was legally in contempt of Scottish law.
I think this is one of those instances were the law has totally failed to keep up with the development of social media; the way google images/FB etc work, mean that any potential witnesses/jurors are likely to be exposed to a picture of any arrested person just by searching their name on the internet - even before they realize they may be a witness.
It seems an idea has even been mooted that no photo of a charged person should be published until after a
verdict, but I don't see how that would ever work today.
Anyhow, the Scottish Justice Secretary doesn't seem to believe any harm has been done to the prosecution's case in this instance.
http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Scottis...ely_aware_of_unusual_publicity'_in_Kular_case