Dotta
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2021
- Messages
- 12,326
- Reaction score
- 75,276
Mr KC Nick J always stays on alertJust pointing out this questioning ^ was in relation to the baby LL left suddenly to go to in room 1 at 9am.
Mr KC Nick J always stays on alertJust pointing out this questioning ^ was in relation to the baby LL left suddenly to go to in room 1 at 9am.
could be wrong but I got the sense the meds she signed for could have been for another baby, not her baby in room 1, and she hung around writing in other babies' (plural) notes until the doctors responded to baby Q. I don't know why they would have mentioned that her other baby was stable at 8.30am and no need to observe again at 9am if the baby genuinely needed a treatment.Ah right so he's saying why would LL need to go the other baby at 9 when they'd only had their obs done half hour earlier? Wonder what meds she signed for for the other baby.
Actually, was the baby who she did the drugs for another baby she was caring for in a different room?
But if you sign for another baby, you often go to the cotside where the nurse is working and check the drugs being made up are the correct amount. It's normally the nurse leading the care who grabs another nurse.It doesn't say that she was called away by anyone though. Just that she asked the other nurse to watch Baby Q around 9am while she went to check on another baby. And then she signed for a medication for the other baby at 9.04
could be wrong but I got the sense the meds she signed for could have been for another baby, not her baby in room 1, and she hung around writing in other babies' (plural) notes until the doctors responded to baby Q. I don't know why they would have mentioned that her other baby was stable at 8.30am and no need to observe again at 9am if the baby genuinely needed a treatment.
yes. they say she left the feeding chart unfinished and made notes in other babies' records to give herself an alibi.So the prosecution are saying LL "sabotaged" the baby and left for someone else to be the person there when the baby collapsed? Is that correct
But if you sign for another baby, you often go to the cotside where the nurse is working and check the drugs being made up are the correct amount. It's normally the nurse leading the care who grabs another nurse.
It will be interesting to find out what stopped her, if guilty, from continuing to attack Baby Q.
I wonder how Dr G felt after begging this exec nurse to remove LL and being refused.If you mean why she didn't try again after the alleged failed murder attempt at 9am, then, if guilty, it was probably her walking in on Dr G after that resus and hearing him asking another nurse how long LL had been gone when Baby Q collapsed, that spooked her enough not to try again.
If guilty, IMO etc.
Wasn't that Dr B or did I miss something?I wonder how Dr G felt after begging this exec nurse to remove LL and being refused.
And then - the next day - another collapse!
He was subjected to blood tests, x-rayed, put on antibiotics, and then the parents showed up. First they weren't allowed to go into room 1, and then when the midwife complained they were allowed in during the afternoon. At some point LL walked in on Dr Gibbs speaking to Mary in the store room about what had happened, which could have been a choice she made to follow them in there.It will be interesting to find out what stopped her, if guilty, from continuing to attack Baby Q.
Good spot on the 0.5.Maybe one for the nurses as I could be completely misunderstanding this...
Apparently Baby Q had an umbilical venous catheter (UVC) and was receiving Babiven via that, and was only having trophic 0.5ml milk feeds.
Does a UVC bypass the stomach? Meaning the stomach would be empty other than the tiny 0.5ml trophic feed (if and when it was given)?
If so could that be why LL is alleged to have possibly injected clear fluid as well as air? Because otherwise there wouldn't have been enough fluid in Baby Q's stomach to bring up/vomit, and she couldn't use excess milk as it would be noticed as Baby Q's feeds were only 0.5ml?
Letby made notes on Child Q's fluid/feeding chart at 8am. Child Q was receiving nutrition Babiven via a UVC.
Lucy Letby trial recap: Prosecution finishes outlining case, defence gives statement
THE prosecution in the trial of Lucy Letby, accused of murdering seven babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital neonatal unit and attempting to…www.chesterstandard.co.uk
He was subjected to blood tests, x-rayed, put on antibiotics, and then the parents showed up. First they weren't allowed to go into room 1, and then when the midwife complained they were allowed in during the afternoon. At some point LL walked in on Dr Gibbs speaking to Mary in the store room about what had happened, which could have been a choice she made to follow them in there.
Baby Q had to be put on a ventilator before the night shift, and in true LL-style, she noted he was declining and on a downward trend. Mr Myers seemed keen to point out that baby Q stabilised "relatively quickly", perhaps seeking to minimise the event, but he was moved to room 1 with the morning event and needed to be put on breathing support.
"Letby notes before the shift handover at 7.30pm: 'Respiratory rate declining (15-19bpm) and intermittent pauses in breathing. Blood gas stable but on downward trend and [Child Q] appearing 'tired'."
JMO
If the prosecution are alleging that that child Q was injected with saline, would it be possible to obtain forensic evidence? Salt levels or something?
Asked what she saw when she was first to arrive at the incubator, Ms Lappalainen said: “He had been sick. I turned him on his side and made sure his airway was alright.”
She had noted clear mucous coming from the baby’s mouth and nose which was suctioned clean.
Asked why she recorded “clear fluid +++”, she said: “The clear fluid means the mucous I’m cleaning. There is no feed in it, no milk in it. It’s like saliva.”
Lucy Letby: Alarms sounded at baby’s cot shortly after nurse left room
ALARMS sounded at a baby’s cot shortly after nurse Lucy Letby left the room, her murder trial has heard.www.chesterstandard.co.uk
Sorry, this sentence is so strangely constructed I have problems understanding the meaning.A professor reviewed brain imaging of Child Q taken in November 2019 - more than three years later. He found evidence of abnormalities which whilst they were not diagnostic of him having suffered a brain injury as a result of being given excessive air and liquid via his NGT, they could be explained.
Lucy Letby trial recap: Prosecution finishes outlining case, defence gives statement