I can see why its one of his mates, as he is his supposed Alibi from cross examination yesterday.I can’t believe that they brought in one of his mates to testify on his behalf. I mean the Jury surely don’t think that this is credible? Plus why is he given his name, but sitting behind a screen? And as for wearing the same trainers and brand that TC is accused of wearing, that is really low. It doesn’t prove anything at all, he could’ve just gone and bought those yesterday. It’s totally irrelevant.
I’m finding it astonishing that this is the level of information in this trial for the poor girl.
However, I think he might have just underminded himself by wearing the same outfit as TC as a blantent attempt to support TCs claim that everyone wears that outfit. Its so blimmin obvious that I think he's shot himself in the foot there (pls excuse the analogy)