.
The accused has not yet been tried and we don't know what the outcome will be. That will be for the trial to determine. JMO Gentle reminder about subjudice during this case. Discussion of possible sentencing could suggest assumption of guilt. So we still need to be careful how we discuss IMO.
As per Silly Billy at start of thread
"
This case is now under sub-judice.
Under sub-judice, the following is not allowed:
Any non compliance with an Order of the court
Anything that may prejudice the accused’s right to a fair trial
Any suggestions or direct accusations that the accused is either guilty or innocent (i.e. the accused cannot be called "the killer", it has to be "alleged killer" or the defendant)
A defendant’s previous history of any offences
Scandalizing the court (disparaging judges/lawyers, any officer of the Court)
Broadcasting anything about proceedings which happen in the jury's absence.
Please do not post anything that violates the above principles.
Thank you.
ETA for reference:
UK Contempt of Court Act 1981"