Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All the sites connected to this case are so horrendously bleak. The latest area cordoned off by police doesn’t look like any kind of “builder’s yard” I know. Police cordon off builders' yard containing skip in Sarah Everard search | Daily Mail Online
Thanks Stella, appreciate your response. I don't see anything about a second necklace being found in the DM article you've linked - again, is there something I'm missing when you're directing me to that article? I'm aware of the developments with the builders yard being cordoned off/searched but I haven't heard anything about a necklace found by divers (as referenced in the Standard article from the post I was replying to: Police trawl through woods in hunt for Sarah Everard’s mobile) in other MSM.
I'm leaning towards the opinion that the mention of a gold necklace found by divers has simply been misreported? Has anyone seen another source corroborating the Standard's article?
All sorts of shift workers drive home after night shifts.
Nurses ,for example are not put up in accommodation to sleep after a night shift.
Although the CPS will have access to all the evidence available, which passed the evidence test for charge, there are likely to be a some evidential gaps, that continue to be explored. The ongoing police activity is indicative of that.
WC is the accused. It is up to a court to decide if he is responsible for the alleged offences. To imply anything different is sub judice.
I am only aware of the one gold necklace, in that link, found on top of the parking metre, unaware of any second gold necklace or anything found in the river - if you have seen that somewhere else and it's an allowed source (mainstream media) then do update us
Great work.This is my first ever post on WS, so apologies if the formatting is wrong. Also I'm reasonably sure this doesn't break WS rules or (more importantly) the sub judice laws, but if they do I'll remove immediately.
And additional apologies if this has already been spotted and discussed, but it's a very long thread and I haven't read it all...
I was looking at the video posted on here of the police and forensics activity outside Poynders Court. To give myself a better understanding of the location they were working on, I went and had a look on Google Maps.
The first picture I've posted below (GM1) shows the precise location they were searching, circled (by me) in red. You can tell because the drain cover on the road matches the video footage.
I had a look around on Google maps and went further up the driveway into the Poynders Court complex, near where the garages/lock-ups with the green doors are located (picture GM2).
There's a CCTV camera there!
And it seems to be pointing in the direction of where the officers were carrying out their activity.
I've zoomed in to it and that is shown on picture GM3.
The images on Google Maps are dated 2018 but other images on Google Maps showing the CCTV was still there are dated Sep 2020.
Now it could be a dummy camera. If it's real, it might not have been working.
Thanks Stella, appreciate your response. I don't see anything about a second necklace being found in the DM article you've linked - again, is there something I'm missing when you're directing me to that article? I'm aware of the developments with the builders yard being cordoned off/searched but I haven't heard anything about a necklace found by divers (as referenced in the Standard article from the post I was replying to: Police trawl through woods in hunt for Sarah Everard’s mobile) in other MSM.
I'm leaning towards the opinion that the mention of a gold necklace found by divers has simply been misreported? Has anyone seen another source corroborating the Standard's article?
This is my first ever post on WS, so apologies if the formatting is wrong. Also I'm reasonably sure this doesn't break WS rules or (more importantly) the sub judice laws, but if they do I'll remove immediately.
And additional apologies if this has already been spotted and discussed, but it's a very long thread and I haven't read it all...
I was looking at the video posted on here of the police and forensics activity outside Poynders Court. To give myself a better understanding of the location they were working on, I went and had a look on Google Maps.
The first picture I've posted below (GM1) shows the precise location they were searching, circled (by me) in red. You can tell because the drain cover on the road matches the video footage.
I had a look around on Google maps and went further up the driveway into the Poynders Court complex, near where the garages/lock-ups with the green doors are located (picture GM2).
There's a CCTV camera there!
And it seems to be pointing in the direction of where the officers were carrying out their activity.
I've zoomed in to it and that is shown on picture GM3.
The images on Google Maps are dated 2018 but other images on Google Maps showing the CCTV was still there are dated Sep 2020.
Now it could be a dummy camera. If it's real, it might not have been working.
Also could they ever extract proof of rape if a person is so damaged?Re first autopsy, can we conclude from that that they have-putting it bluntly-she is intact, or at least they have all of her remains?, if so probably still phone, clothing maybe?, if they do not have a cause of death they should maybe have a grasp on what method has been used to destroy/cover up evidence re her body, how and what he used etc... So my thoughts are still phone, clothing etc x (all IMO)