Cant remember whether I already posted this (sorry) Being creatures of habit, once WC had found his favoured route out of London, he would probably stick to it, which would take him past the McDonalds Streatham (I know some reports have said Clapham, has the McDs location been confirmed yet?) so I wouldn't be at all surprised if the IE happened there. Also, IE doesn't necessarily mean that the perpetrator exposes himself in the course of the action, I believe that if you are already exposed and leave yourself deliberately exposed knowing or with the intention that someone sees you then that is IE. E.g. it's not illegal to be naked in your own house but if the doorbell rang and you looked out of the window and it was the postwoman and you answered the door to her naked knowing that she would see you, that would be IE. What I'm saying is that WC didn't necessarily unzip himself and take something out during the offence he could well have had it already on show. Here's what I think could've happened JMO.. goes to drive thrust, already unzipped, with the intention that the person at the payment window (who will be looking down into the car) sees him. Woman at payment window initially thinks she sees him exposed but is unsure.(WC pays cash to avoid paying card?) WC orders something that needs to be cooked to order so is told to wait in the parking area... he sits in his car exposed so that when second female MCD employee brings him his order he winds his window down and she can see him. If caught no doubt his "defence" would be he forgot to zip up, or he was adjusting himself in private in the car and didn't expect his order to arrive. Maybe thats why report of it being in front of 2 separate employees and the car would've been caught on CCTv. I dont think he would be so stupid as to expose himself right in front of CCTv but who knows?? It seems he has no morals and is a complete **** (MOO but one likely to be shared by many others)