I was looking at the first two statements JD brought up for defamation, and I find them to be linked. I think that when you read the title, "I spoke up against sexual violence..." And then you read the next statement, "Two years ago, I became a representative of domestic abuse..." (Or something like that), it becomes obvious to this reader that two years ago, she became a representative of domestic abuse because she spoke up against sexual violence during her divorce or TRO with JD.
I think that defames him. It makes people think, too, that the divorce was about sexual violence, and I find it to be false because back then, she wasn't even making SA claims. I'd link those two statements together. I also want to know "how" she became a "representative of domestic abuse." Did someone crown her that? I mean, that would have to make her statements true and who deemed her statements true and crowned her that?
I'm not sure about the third statement.
I know that she wants to say she didn't write that title, but she took ownership of that title with her tweet.
I wonder why the WAPO thought they could write a title like that anyway. What was said to them to make them write that?
Anyone have any thoughts?