Lurk a lot. Post rarely. But want to get out some thoughts now that the verdict in M1. IMO it will be very interesting when (IF) the DT ever speaks out about JAs influence or demands re: the defense strategy.
IIRC, one of our fabulous WS lawyers commented on the astounding number of in chambers meetings with the DT. Granted, its a DP case
maybe thats the norm with so much at stake. My bet? JA kept enforcing her ideas of how her defense should be handled and the DT was arse covering by getting JAs Einstein-ian theories in front the judge.
IMO, theres no other way to explain the hail Mary crime of passion, make it manslaughter DT closing. The DT did a reasonable job of showing that JAs relationship with TA was not the same as other TA relationships (dont throw tomatoes). There was TAs worst thing thats ever happened to me email. Why not continue the argument? TA was pizzed. JA sparked his anger (again). He lashed out and, in 62 seconds, JA in a frenzied fog -- did what she had to do to defend herself. (I like tomatoes. So if you throw one, make it a Campari.)
Bottom line (no pun intended): JA is guilty of M1. No argument from me. But
Wow. I hope her DT speaks out. Someday.
OMG! As I write this, the Phoenix post-verdict interview just started.
Ill post this after the interview.
Went blank
Unexpected verdict
No premeditation
Jury didnt believe you?
Worst outcome is natural life, longevity runs in my family. Not looking forward to it.
DP better.
Hope Alexander family finds peace moves on
.with their brother the way they want. (Cant guarantee that last line)