Verdict Watch 05/06/2013 - part 2

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Court did not say "because of his position". All it said was the State did not have the authority to accept or offer a plea.

IDK, I just read it, don't claim to know the reasoning behind the court decision.

JA is a liar, she has her proxy tweeter say the "family wouldn't settle" as though it's the family's fault. In reality the family would have been delighted if she'd pled guilty to 1st degree murder. Instead, just like JA has done all of her life, she blames everyone else for her predicament. :floorlaugh:

I read the minute entries and there's more than one as I recall regarding a plea. It seemed clear to me at the time that the reason was that a particular person had to agree, and it wasn't Juan. There was something rescheduled to potentially accommodate the person who did have authority to agree, but I don't remember his name. I'm not making it up to be "mean" to Juan. He's an assistant prosecutor and this is a dp case, so it doesn't surprise me that his superior would make that decision.

The tweets say that the State, and the State and the family refused a plea. Even though the State doesn't have to listen to the family, everyone here knows that both of those things are true. The family wants the DP and the State wants it to. Neither was willing to accept a plea or offer a different deal in compromise. Including life with or without parole.
 
Am I in trouble? I just clicked to reply, and I got a message that says my post would have to be approved by a mod before it would be posted. I've never seen this before.

No, I have gotten that before, if you were quoting a post, that post might have been removed. :dunno:
 
I think it was him !!! Not positive though as its just on in the backround...

:floorlaugh: juror 10 hasn't dated any GIRLS since high school. :floorlaugh:

Staging. Plain ole cheap parlor trick staging. Deplorable HLN. :facepalm:
 
1. The State refused her offered plea. The family did not refuse to settle they were never offered a chance to settle. Jodi you're no Einstein

2. You forced this you witch! You delighted in what you did to Travis so you can cut this BS OUT.

Thus endeth the rant!

She left out the option of State Assisted Involuntary Suicide.
 
Morning (for me)

Re the 10:00 start time today, that's what time JA's case is currently scheduled for court. However IF the jurors do have questions or have a verdict, there are a lot of cases currently listed before. I wonder if they will postpone the other cases.

Dang are you up already or did you never go to sleep?!?
I need to keep on your schedule, so I know if I should yell at you or not. :giggle:
 
JA just twittered that she would have signed a plea years ago to avoid "this disaster", but she was refused a plea as the State and the family refused to settle.

She also says she wanted so much to avoid trial but the State forced it. Her only other option was suicide....

Sounds like she's scared. About time.

As Juan said, nothing is HER fault. Everyone else is to blame for this 'disaster.' It's their fault this went to trial. She's responsible for nothing.
 
******

(Sorry - having trouble quoting for some reason)

In my theory, the person is someone who is guilty of the crime he accused Jodi of that when he said "you scammed me." She replied, "I did not, but I know who did." He is demanding she defend herself by providing the guilty party's personal information. He knows she is behind the scam and is ready to tell Chris Hughes and the authorities.

She, of course, cannot provide it and knows she will be fired and disgraced if Chris Hughes and other higher ups in PPL find out what she did. The only way she can stop Travis from ruining her chances with Ryan AND ANYONE ELSE in PPL is to kill him before he reveals her crime.


Anagrammy

:floorlaugh: And how'd that work out for her? Now she's on trial for her life. :floorlaugh:

And she thinks she's smarter than Einstein? :scared:
 
The State could have accepted her plea or countered with life w/ or w/o parole. That Juan personally didn't have authority to accept a plea based on his position in the prosecutor's office doesn't mean anything. It would have just been a question of getting the person with the authority to accept it to do so. She's not bs'ing. The state has never considered a plea and that's why the case went to trial. The State is not bound by the wishes of the family either. Juan doesn't represent the family, he represents the citizens of Arizona.

IIRC, it states in JA's plea deal motion that she doesn't believe she would ever get DP. It states the "worst" she would get is LWOP and therefore, would feel no reason to accept any plea that included any life (w or w/o parole) offer.
She threatened to trash Travis unless they would agree to something less than a life sentence.
I don't blame Juan for not taking the plea. I don't blame the family for not taking the plea. I would sit through hell and back to see my loved ones murderer get the punishment she/he deserves. JMO
 
Ugh. I'm watching my recorded HLN After Dark and when Vinnie mentioned two years ago we got another verdict and I tweeted it. And then they cut to the crowd outside the Courthouse chanting "Justice for Caylee" I totally teared up. It KILLS me that sweet little girl never got her justice.
 
It's not up to the family, it's up to the prosecutor/ "the state" and Juan refused her plea because it wasn't 2nd degree murder, it was premed 1st degree. The family does want the Death Penalty.

Im not speaking to the aspects of the Alexander family in your post. With all due respect Linask, that must be a CA thing as it relates to the statement "it is not up to the family". I was a victim of a violent crime and I was consulted and actually asked if me and my family if we were "okay" or found XYZ acceptable with every decision the prosecution made in relation to charges and prosecution of the perpetrator--maybe that is how they do things in Texas. IDK it is likely that each state is different
 
:floorlaugh: juror 10 hasn't dated any GIRLS since high school. :floorlaugh:

Staging. Plain ole cheap parlor trick staging. Deplorable HLN. :facepalm:


Haha... I get it...:floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh:
 
She won't win. The other inmates will demote her and never allow her to be anything more. She will finally get it. She won't win friends or influence anyone in prison.
Moo
Sent from my SGH-T679 using Tapatalk 2

We are just going to have to disagree on this point and that's OK - We all have different experiences in life and view things in different ways but JA is not a "normal" person. JA will never be "demoted" by anyone and she proved that to Travis Alexander, didn't she? She will never "get it"...She has a personality disorder that cannot be repaired with drugs or rehab or incarceration. Her entire being is to influence others. That's just my opinion...
 
For this reason I wish the jury would deliberate for 2 or 3 weeks, let her sit in that cage all day with nothing to do. :lol:

She thinks because the jury didn't come back today that she is off the hook IMO
She is full of herself.
Entitlement
Malignant Narcissim
Her downfall.
That won't fly with chicks in prison
Moo
Sent from my SGH-T679 using Tapatalk 2
 
Completely agree. Mr. Columbo (guy from Budget) said he thoroughly cleaned the car, including the "red kool-aid" stains. He also testified that all four floor mats were missing when JA returned the car. Who does that? Someone with something to hide.



If I remember correctly the stains were described as "kool-aid" with no color named and the prosecution and the defense never bothered to follow up on getting a color. I was thinking lemon yellow, lime green, orange orange. Strange nobody cared what color the kool-aid stains were.......
 
It's not up to the family, it's up to the prosecutor/ "the state" and Juan refused her plea because it wasn't 2nd degree murder, it was premed 1st degree. The family does want the Death Penalty.

Im not speaking to the aspects of the Alexander family in your post. With all due respect Linask, that must be a CA thing as it relates to the statement "it is not up to the family". I was a victim of a violent crime and I was consulted and actually asked if my family and I were "okay" or found XYZ acceptable with every decision the prosecution made in relation to charges and prosecution of the perpetrator--maybe that is how they do things in Texas. IDK it is likely that each state is different
 
:wave:

We're going to have to move over to a new thread. This thread will close in 15 minutes.

Please continue the discussion here:


[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?p=9382852#post9382852"]Verdict Watch 05/06/2013 and 05/07/2013 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]
 
Dear "Stabby Einstein":

If you ever have the need or feel compelled to write to a judge again (which I doubt since you're getting the DP), may I suggest:
--use punctuation properly (and do not overuse commas)
--less is more: eliminate redundant, superfluous sentences
--refrain from awkward sentence structure and phrasing
--stick to your format: do not sign your name in the middle of the final page if utilizing left-margin alignment throughout the letter
--please use "Respectfully," when signing off to a judge
--work on your cursive style; curly-cues reek of immaturity

But we'll cut you a break since you're not an attorney and you did not stay in a Holiday Inn last night.

And of course, it's not your fault, dontcha' know!

:rockon:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
146
Guests online
241
Total visitors
387

Forum statistics

Threads
609,512
Messages
18,255,160
Members
234,678
Latest member
NavyGirl75
Back
Top