forestchilde
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2013
- Messages
- 206
- Reaction score
- 0
The big question I have on his side of the story - MH says that RAT wasn't the last person to see AM on Aug 3rd - but that RAT knows who was. How does RAT know this black unidentified male was the last person to see AM (by RAT's own account) if AM & unidentified male left his camper at the same time in SEPARATE vehicles??
I agree so much! Now we don't know what RAT's exact words are, but the fact that the attorney alluding to this guy being the LAST person to see her is odd. I'd love to know what the exact words of RAT were. The article on NBC29 says:
Hallahan says his client wasn't the last person with Alexis on August 3 - but that Taylor knows who was.
Then it goes on:
"Mr. Taylor told law enforcement that he met this missing girl at the Liberty gas station by coincidence. He had parked at the pumps to buy cigarettes and she had parked at the pumps to get gas," Hallahan said. "She made a comment to him about smoking marijuana based on her seeing him at another car wash in Lovingston weeks or a month before that. He had indicated to her that he would like to get some more. She said, I know a guy' she told him to meet at another location in Lovingston and they rode up there in both cars."
Ok...so this tells us the this is from his interview with LE. But that second bolded comment is odd. she told him to meet at another location in Lovingston. Why would she tell him (RAT) to meet at RAT's place? If she indeed was going to connect these two for a drug deal I think she'd have some other place familiar to her in mind, don't you?
According to Hallahan, Taylor repeatedly told law enforcement the story. Hallahan says there is DNA evidence of the unidentified man in the camper that should help authorities find him.
Repeatedly huh? I wonder if there are any discrepancies between the accounts he has told?