To Global Justice Ops:
I realize that some of my comments may seem boorish. Well, I'm sorry. I usually try to obey the Golden Rule. I'll try to make a better go of it from here.
So, allow me to say this: while I understand fully that there will always be SOME inconsistencies in a person's statements, innocent though they may be, to use Lawrence Schiller's words, it's the total number of inconsistencies that are very troubling. I'll give you a specific example: when PR was told about the fibers in 2000, she made no attempt to offer an innocent explanation (whether she couldn't or Lin Wood just wouldn't allow it is perhaps debatable). Two years later, she offered the "explanation" (to a reporter, not an LEO) that it must have been from when she lay on top of JB's body after JR brought it upstairs. But that doesn't jibe, because, according to what JR himself wrote in Death of Innocence, he'd already covered JB from head to foot before PR even entered the room.
As for not implicating anyone, maybe not directly (and I say even that with reservations), but they hinted pretty strongly at times, especially towards the housekeeper, LHP, at least early on. When they realized that wasn't going anywhere, they decided to go with what Lou Smit was selling.