Only after my first question is addressed if at all....
Cheney Mason makes dramatic reference to his "hearing problem" at least once a day. As Mason is the Death qualified counsel, is it possible that his hearing could be used to help KC on appeal? That he missed an opportunity or comment becasue of his hearing....or missed the live transcription?
His mention of his hearing issues seems somewhat deliberate. The old jokes....I get that.....the hearing jokes....inappropriate.
Yes, right now (yuri and WS post & Hornsby). Hornsby mentioning he felt it was somewhat unprofessional for him (Yuri) to do. Kinda like Baez trying to do what they did to Furhman in the oj case. But there wasn't an issue, so that's why Your Honour didn't let it in (because it was so non-specific).
Can we ask Richard about "probative" versus "prejudicial"?
Isn't ALL evidence prejudicial? Aren't prosecutors trying to prejudice/convince the jury that a defendant is guilty?
Example: Say there is a robbery/murder at a convenience store that is caught on the security cameras. Video clearly shows the attackers face. Video clearly shows the license number and make/model of the getaway car. LE tracks that to the attackers home and arrests him. Isn't the original video evidence? Wouldn't the jury be prejudiced when they see the defendant's face on the video committing the crime?
FWIW, my DH feels about GA just as Hornsby said the jurors might.
interesting.He knows nothing except what he has heard during trial and he thinks George is extremely suspect.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.