Toughest things to do in a situation like this is to find a place to kick off. The rest usually follows on its own steam. Ask any question about anything and I will try to answer it. Note* I wear boxers,not briefs.
I thank our Webmaster for making this available for me to rant and rave to the readers and to allow me to maybe educate you about how corrupt the Suffolk County system really is.
OK - story for today:
Driving on the L.I.E. earlier today a box type truck passed me by. It had the name of a Master Concepts cabinet maker out of Bay Shore, NY. It brought back memories of my former son in law's horror show.
Spota/Burke will offer false evidence the SIL helped burglars rob his store on an October night in 1999. The MC owner would first report the burglars removed $100,000.00 from his safe. Problem is the insurance company didn't agree and I believe they offered him more like $15,000 for his alleged loss. Undaunted , the owner did get an accountant to make up invoices stating he had bought equipment worth near that amount. Yes, I know who the accountant was, he was the cousin of my SIL's then best friend, and he told me what happened. I also learned the owner asked the cousin to get his friend, my SIL to light a fire under the detective's azzez to investigate the case. As this came to my attention 5 years after the burglary this was difficult to prove.
I interviewed the owner about this information and, of course, he said this wasn't true. I also mentioned to him the detectives working the burglary case did an outstanding job in this investigation. He said to me: If going on vacation for the next three weeks is an outstanding job then so be it. I have written evidence this WASN'T true.
I also mentioned to him the detectives did several polygrpaphs of at least one person he suspected of burglarizing his store. He said that wasn't true despite the fact I have evidence to the contrary. SCPD, actually did a great job investigating this case - they just wasn't able to make a case - through no fault of their own.
The detective that had this case was brought in by the DA to testify in my son in law's case. IMO, he gave testimony that exculpated my son in law of committing this crime. At the time of his testimony he had since been transferred from the local precinct detective squad to the DA Squad. No beef with him as he testified to the truth. That it was near impossible, given the logistics of who was where that it was near impossible to the SIL to act as a lookout for this crime. The detective even confirmed that the losses the owner said were lost suggested it was a lie.
So if you believe the SIL went to the detectives to investigate this case then you would have to believe the SIL would be crazy to go to the detectives urging them to investigate a case he was allegedly involved in.