robthomaseyes
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2007
- Messages
- 707
- Reaction score
- 0
Why? 1) He worked until 2:30 at one job, came home, and went back within 3 hours to another one, at which he worked until 3:30?? And would have had to get up in the morning to go back to the first one? The whole "this is the first and only time I ever had to work nights" strikes me as very, very suspicious.
2) he claims he came home at 3:45, went to check on the boys, who are 8 and 6, and didn't bother checking on the INFANT. What kind of parent would look at big boys who hardly need looking at (yes, i know we all do it, but t hey don't really NEED it) but ignore the baby??
3) his statement that he woke up Deborah and said something along the lines of "so what's going on?" at which time she bolted out of bed, and only then did he suddenly think, hey, maybe something's not right, and go check on Lisa. Something strikes me as very odd about that.
Is it possible Deborah passed out, he came home around 10:30 or so, saw her drunk, heard the baby crying, and became enraged, harming the baby without meaning to? If Deborah was passed out, he had several hours (the 4 hour window) to dispose of Lisa.
And maybe now he's trying to cast suspicion on DB. He may be berating her in private about her drinking, which is why she was defensive during the interview. Maybe he's trying to talk it into her that she hurt Lisa or caused it, and she's just reacting like that b/c deep down she knows that drunk or not, she couldn't and wouldn't have done something like that. It's also strange to me that he would say, on national t.v., that DB is the only person without an alibi. Way to cast suspicion on your own wife! He may even have dragged DB's phone with him knowing it would ping so the cops would suspect DB.
His demeanor is very, very abnormal. Sad or not, I've never seen a person who lost their child that can't look into people's eyes, or into the camera to make a plea.
2) he claims he came home at 3:45, went to check on the boys, who are 8 and 6, and didn't bother checking on the INFANT. What kind of parent would look at big boys who hardly need looking at (yes, i know we all do it, but t hey don't really NEED it) but ignore the baby??
3) his statement that he woke up Deborah and said something along the lines of "so what's going on?" at which time she bolted out of bed, and only then did he suddenly think, hey, maybe something's not right, and go check on Lisa. Something strikes me as very odd about that.
Is it possible Deborah passed out, he came home around 10:30 or so, saw her drunk, heard the baby crying, and became enraged, harming the baby without meaning to? If Deborah was passed out, he had several hours (the 4 hour window) to dispose of Lisa.
And maybe now he's trying to cast suspicion on DB. He may be berating her in private about her drinking, which is why she was defensive during the interview. Maybe he's trying to talk it into her that she hurt Lisa or caused it, and she's just reacting like that b/c deep down she knows that drunk or not, she couldn't and wouldn't have done something like that. It's also strange to me that he would say, on national t.v., that DB is the only person without an alibi. Way to cast suspicion on your own wife! He may even have dragged DB's phone with him knowing it would ping so the cops would suspect DB.
His demeanor is very, very abnormal. Sad or not, I've never seen a person who lost their child that can't look into people's eyes, or into the camera to make a plea.
