justthinking2008
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2008
- Messages
- 118
- Reaction score
- 0
T
So KL might be prone to 'exaggeration' even though there hasn't been any evidence shown to warrant this belief, but you don't doubt any of Brad's statements? Why not? Why is he believable and yet none of the affiants on the plaintiff's side are given the same courtesy of belief?
And why would he be afraid that Nancy and sis would take off that day and escape? Did they have bags packed and in the car? Were bags packed for the kids? (no evidence of that). Nancy had no money and did not have the kids' passports. Where could she go? She didn't have enough gas in her car!
I did not say that I blindly believe BC's statements, but his statements are easier to back up than some of the hearsay second hand affiants. BC can produce receipts and CC statements to back up his statements.
As far as escape goes a person desperate to escape would not care if their bags were packed or not, they would just leave and maybe NC had indicated to BC that she would do just that and with KL there what a perfect time, the children would not have needed passports to get into Canada, the fact they were born here does not make them automatic US citizens, at the age of consent they will have to make a declaration of citizenship.
I agree with NCSU regarding the party favors the costs of such things can escalate at an alarming rate. Maybe he would not let her buy the balloon because it just was not in the budget, I know $3 seems a small amount, but when you are on a tight budget you have to watch every dollar. Of course KL was not happy about this and I am sure NC was not either, and yes it makes BC look like a tight wad, but I really believe he had no choice, they were headed to bankruptcy.