That fits CA to a "T" as well!
Who is the "controller' in the A family?
ThinkTank;6103056]
The Diary was turned over to LE, by Conway, on Feb 12, 2010.
What took LE so long to take a closer look at this diary? Why did CA feel the need to give it to Brad anyway after all the hiding she did? (she could have just given him the dogs diary!)
A jury of 12 not knowing KC, GA or CA, and who will speak? GA and CA!
Will the jury hear KC's voice at all?
IMO the defense strategy will be
reasonable doubt.
AND they will point at the grandparents. Neither specifically but, both had opportunity and means, but motive? hmmmm... Well they may not do well there, but once the jury gets a taste of how nasty both can be when forced to answer questions... I dunno...
I could easily see JB (or whomever) saying, she left Caylee with her parents, They admitted Caylee never spent one night away from their home, so KC could not have had Caylee with her. CA was trying to take Caylee away so KC let her have the child... went and partied her rear off, it was CA of GA trying to teach KC
"the lesson" and there was an accident blah blah blah,
The computer searches... (
has it be proven it was not another Anthony family member?)
We have them bringing home the Pontaic
AND cleaning it. NOT calling 911 for how many days? do we know exactly?... per CA "There was no ODOR!" GA didn't agree did he?
911 had been called to the home before...(
do we know who made those calls??)
CA went to the police office with KC but. they were closed... would she have told them then about Caylee? Why did CA wait till the thrid call to mention a dead body?
All the evidence leads back to the home...(where all 3 live)
CA kicked TES out... not KC
CA wouldn't give items of Caylee's to the searchers for a scent...
CA talked of suicide GA even wrote out a suicide note. (
will the jury even hear this? or has it been tabeled?)
CA and GA let the "killer" of their grandchild live with them when she was out on bail? proves they were not scared of KC!
In a backwards way, is it possible for that poor jury to become so confused by the testimony of Ca and GA they could be pushed into believing CA/GA have never tried to cover anything up for KC but only tried to protect themselves?
Any normal person would never understand why CA waited so long to call
or most of what we know she has done... question is... how much will the jury be told, and is there
enough proof it could not have been one or both or all 3 of them in on the cover up? :banghead:
Inded CA and KC are "crafty" and I pray JB is long gone before that trial starts or KC may get off completely because of inadequate representation... STILL not convinced that isn't JB's plan.
:twocents:... but this has been going through my mind OVER and OVER!
SOMEONE please set me straight!
I am skeered she will get a not guilty!
I have followed this since July 08, but dang it is confusing![/QUOTE]
BBM
I know, as do most who follow this case, that CA is a control freak and wants to be in control of everything and everyone. BUT, I do not see that she was in control where KC was concerned. Between these two, KC was more in control, imo. If CA had been in control of KC, KC would have graduated high school with her class. If CA had been in control of KC, KC would not have stolen huge sums of money from her and others. If CA had been in control of KC, there would never have been that scene at Uncle Rick's wedding with CA standing there claiming KC was a virgin and therefore not pregnant. If CA had been in control of KC, we might not be here on this forum discussing the loss of Caylee Marie. I whole-heartedly agree that CA tries to control everything. But, I disagree that she was anywhere near in control of KC. She tried to be, and failed miserably. Perhaps if she had simply tried to parent rather than control, things may have turned out different. JMO.
ETA: The quotes are broken for some reason. My reply is the BBM and down at the bottom.