only Lee I think.:loser. Weren't ga and ca testifing under a limited immunity deal? Wouldn't that be harder to lie under?? Easier tp prosecute??? It's not like they weren't warned.
I don't think they'll waste more money trying to prosecute her for perjury.
in a email she said they are lucky I didn't give them the dogs toothbrush instead of Caylee's
Kathi text messaged Cindy right away and forwarded the emails to the FBI, which is already investigating an allegation that Cindy gave investigators the wrong hairbrush when they were trying to get a DNA sample for Caylee
http://www.wftv.com/news/18181289/detail.html
The email went to ehr spokesman who promptly quit working for her
LP and his associates also reportedly heard her say this -fwiw
no. they did not want her found IMO
thats why she was giving the FBI the wrong items
why was shj so worried about covering up DNA
when her grandchild was missing?
If she is on a disability with the company, they now have grounds to fire her. People that commit perjury should not be dealing with sensitive medical information and patients, administering medication, or be relied upon for factual information - a requirement in medical record keeping for health and legal reasons.
'Lippman is already making the talking show rounds. Tonight on NG he said that Cindy is still adamant that she did the searches and now says it might have just been on a different computer.
Now I say to that...wait a minute. Didn't she already say that they only had that one computer and her laptop that Casey used all the time? Oh, the webs we weave.
IMO the best thing Lippman could do for his clients is get busy on some of his other cases and let this die down in the media.
ETA - Another interesting thing Lippman said (something like this) "hypothetically if I could get her to recant, I would but she maintains she did those searches". From what I've read about perjury, if you lie under oath and later change your testimony or recant your testimony you are protected from perjury. Now..tell me that Lippman doesn't know she committed perjury?
IMO
OT but what did Lee need immunity from?
Excellent article about Cindy and perjury. Article is from seamusorily.blogspot.com. Statement analysis.
"It is clear that Cindy lied, and that she did so because she wanted to take premeditation out of the case. Cindy's lie was designed to have a significant consequence; that is, to force the jury to consider only lesser charges against Casey, since it could not longer be argued that Casey planned months in advance to put little Caylee to sleep with chloroform"
"If the State Attorney's Office chooses not to prosecute Cindy Anthony for perjury, the message is clear: it is alright to lie under oath as long as you have a good reason. If that is the case, who should determine if one's reason is good enough to excuse perjury? Is it acceptable to lie for a child, for a spouse or loved one? Is it acceptable for a paid expert to lie, if telling the truth would mean the end of their career and reputation? Is it acceptable for an attorney to lie, if they think their lie could help their client? Who is to say that one reason is more or less acceptable than the other? "
Just part of the article. The comments are interesting also.
http://***************************/2011/07/cindy-perjury-and-state-of-justice.html
I don't think they'll waste more money trying to prosecute her for perjury.
OT but what did Lee need immunity from?
The OP summed it up so brilliantly that I have nothing to add except that I agree wholeheartedly. I doubt that she'll actually be prosecuted, though. =/
Absolutely not !!!!
With DP on the table, many a parent would lie IMO. One of the many reason why I am so vehemently opposed to DP, since it punishes innocent parents/close relatives.
It is insane to expect a normal mother to assist the prosecution in obtaining DP. That is why in many countries(even those with no DP), do not require parents to testify against their own children. For some obscure reason, that privilege only exists for spouses in the USA.
Has not she suffered more than enough already?
It would be barbaric/inhumane to charge her with anything. She had nothing to do with Caylee's violent death. Unless you want to blame Cindy for loving Caylee too much and thereby soliciting ICA's wrath. All IMO of course.
And I bet the wonderful JP would agree with me.
I think Cindy and Lee's whole testimony was staged by the defense, even down to her wearing the big mumu dress the first couple of days, and looking older and sicker. IMO, she did it on purpose to create some doubt and so did Lee. The state proved that she was at work most of that month and hadn't looked up chlorophyll much less chloroform, but she got the point across that she is either delusional, forgetful, or a liar. I don't really trust any of them or their testimony until all this is over.