I posted before (on a different thread) but received no response. More than saving her own skin, I believe it is her mother CA whom KC's lies are intended to protect from the truth. For this reason I continue wondering if she wouldn't, in fact, rather face the full force of the State of Florida, whatever that may bring, than to admit negligence--and face her mother's wrath. We shall see what else the State prosecution has but with or without Caylee's body, the one thing it must have in order to proceed with the charge of murder is a working theory. For KC to effectively deny or defend against charges that Caylee's death was intentional and pre-meditated would seem to require ultimately an admission of guilt to nearly every other charge she presumably will face--including but not limited to the neglect and false statements with which she is already charged but obstruction, tampering and destruction of evidence, abuse of a corpse et al. Which is itself a HUGE gamble but got me to wondering how many years she would be facing in FL just on these charges? Who knows what else the State has or what FL may feel can possibly prove this or another premeditation scenario. But it all brings me to this: IF it was instead initially a drowning negligence scenario, covered up by KC--what would charges have been, if any? Please just bear with me and someone kindly explain, usually are charges brought against the parent(s) of a toddler who wanders into a pool while poorly supervised, eg? (This may prove to be a mute point I realize, but I'm asking because I believe I've heard of situations in which parents who report are not even charged.) Which, were it the case, ie chloroform searches postdated Caylee's presumed death etc Casey may never have been held legally culpable--had she never in turn concealed, lied, tampered (nor gone on stealing binges). Also because, in this scenario, she likely destroyed the only evidence which could have proven this. JMHO