Aussiecriminals
Member
Something tells me Casey will not be with us for very long...Call it Karma, call it what you will...She will have a day of reckoning when she again meets her daughter eye to eye
I'm confused by the consecutive vs concurent thing in that I don't know if that is totally up to the judge or whether there are guidelines he must follow that determine that. However, I am hoping that she gets one year per count to be served consecutive and that time served can only start from January of last year when she was sentenced for check fraud and given time served for those offenses. I mean, it isn't possible that time served gets to count for both is it? And didn't the judge sentence her in late January to time served at that time on the check fraud charges? So wouldn't that mean that the only time she's been in jail that could be considered time served on these charges would be since January 2010? And wouldn't that mean be only 1 1/2 years so if she got 4 years to be served consecutive, wouldn't that mean she still had 2 1/2 years to go?
I realize that isn't much considering what she is getting away with, but I'm sure hoping that she doesn't walk out free tomorrow. Someone may have asked about this time served regarding the check fraud before as I haven't had time to read the whole thread, but for now, I'm hoping that the time prior to the check fraud sentencing won't count in any sentence she receives tomorrow.
It is confusing. On the check charges I think she got time served. Which would have been about 1.5 years. If the judge gives her 4 years then I am not sure if it starts on day one so that her 1.5 years for check and then these new charges start at the same time or
or if they start now. Or if they start after that last judgement for the check charges.
Sooooo If it starts at day one of her being in jail then she would have about a year left. But they have buy time for good behavior. I don't know how much she has. So it would be maybe 6-8 months? But then if he lumps them all together then no she has served more than the one year since the check charges. So it would be time served again.
Will George & Cindy greet her when she walks out Thursday?
Grandmaj...do you really think so? I can't imagine him setting her free tomorrow.I knew it wasn't good when the judge quickly leafed past the first page and then again the second never stopping to read until he got to the false information pages at the back. I don't think he could believe his eyes looking once again through the verdict pages.
I don't expect him to give her any deals tomorrow.
Just for the seriousness of what she lied about and what those lies cost the state of Florida and the lives that were impacted by the lies, I would hope against hope that he would make her stay on as long as he can possibly hold her, legally, on what charges she has incurred. Since Judge Strickland allowed her sentences to run concurrent on the check charges it is highly likely that Judge Perry may do the same. Concurrent, she walks tomorrow, right? Because that is just a single one year sentence, correct? She may walk and we all have to somehow face it. We knew it the moment we heard not guilty. That's the thing that kicked us in the stomach is her walking away free and clear. It can happen in just a few hours. Let's all just pray that somehow, someway justice will be served up to Miss Got Away with Murder Anthony.Grandmaj...do you really think so? I can't imagine him setting her free tomorrow.
I suppose I'm in the minority on this one, but I've decided that I want her to be released tomorrow, while the verdict is still in the news.
While I'm certainly not condoning any violence towards her, that doesn't mean I particularly mind the thought of an uncomfortable Casey looking over her shoulder for the rest of her bella vita.
I'm on the same page as you are! She's been found not guilty so get her azz out on the street as quick as possible and let her face the music of her beautiful life.
I've got a feeling that when she gets the reception she is assured to her reaction will be something like the last scene of Dangerous Liaisons played so beautifully by Glenn Close.
I thought that is what it stood for all along.
She doesn't have a Driver's license, either. How is she going to get a plane ticket or passport without an ID?
I knew it wasn't good when the judge quickly leafed past the first page and then again the second never stopping to read until he got to the false information pages at the back. I don't think he could believe his eyes looking once again through the verdict pages.
I don't expect him to give her any deals tomorrow.