My frustration leaves me asking..."will we ever get answers?" Will we ever know what was in that notebook? Feeling like things are going cold and dark and that nothing or anyone will be accountable, even possibly Brian's last words.
There's the added complication that the vehicle was in its registered driveway. How is a vehicle "stolen" if it is parked right in the driveway where it belongs? For all police knew at the time, Gabby parked it there then left for somewhere else.BBM
That's an excellent point. You're right! That hadn't crossed my mind until now but you're right: Why would LE issue a warrant for his arrest for the use of unauthorised devices (or WTTE) but not one for theft of a vehicle?
That leads me to believe that LE know he hadn't stolen the vehicle.
MOO
ETA - I think this is why a warrant for vehcile theft was not issed against BL.
No I am not certainYou seem certain that data will be released.
There's no guarantee of this though, right?
LE are not obliged to release anything to the public, unless I'm mistaken..
MOO
I hadn't read this before---has anyone else?From the sun, for what that’s worth. Moo.
https://www.the-sun.com/news/3954140/brian-laundries-parents-cops-immunity-death/
Parents told cops where to find Brian in deal for immunity, friend says
No I am not certain
I said "if" we get them.
I said I hope we would.
I hadn't read this before---has anyone else?
"In a TV interview, the lawyer for Laundrie's family said "conversations were had with respect to certain charges..."
This is from the link up above.
My frustration leaves me asking..."will we ever get answers?" Will we ever know what was in that notebook? Feeling like things are going cold and dark and that nothing or anyone will be accountable, even possibly Brian's last words.
Excellent post! Touche'!!RSBM
Transcript of Joe Petito’s comments in his 28.46 min. interview with Dr Phil.
“It’s not even his van. … First of all you [BL] came home without her and you had the van 10 days in your driveway. So now I’ve got:
What happened with the van? Did you clean it? Did your parents help you clean it?
Did they help cover up a crime, you know, after the fact? ...
You stole a car over, over – across how many states? You know, can you be arrested for that?
…
The problem with that is, that van was Gabby’s. So he could leave that van right there. I’m jumping on a plane. Tell me where she’s at. I’ll be there in a few hours. If I’ve got to get a private plane, I will do that right this second. I don’t care what it takes. So he better walk his little behind over to somewhere else and figure out how he’s gonna get home to his parents, ‘cause that van is in her name, not the other way around."
If various posters proposed 1-4 in your quote, they're only speculating. The only way the Ls could believe they both owned the van was if either/both told them so, and that is completely contrary to what JP said above.
I don't think we're going to hear anything for weeks due to the anthropologist needing time to do their examination.
I also feel the same as you - will we ever get answers? A part of me highly doubts it. And while I don't matter, Gabby's family does and they deserve the answers.
bbm
Hmmm......
Wonder if his sister was threatened not to talk ?
If she knew nothing-- why wouldn't she answer her phone ?
She said iirc, that her kids called Gabby, "Aunt Gabby" ?
That would indicate a closeness between them, that would make answering a phone call to be a normal habit.
Imo.
I felt that BL should have been arrested for theft of property, over a certain $ amount, as soon as LE knew that wasn't his van, and the owner was a Missing person! BAM
M00
Well it.was.not.reported.stolen afaik and if its registered.to that address what can they do? The car was.returned to the address.on registration by the time thy started.looking!I felt that BL should have been arrested for theft of property, over a certain $ amount, as soon as LE knew that wasn't his van, and the owner was a Missing person! BAM
M00
I think once the phones calls started abs hearing the messages left they knew Brian was in trouble! If they called B first he then told his family not to answer them abd maybe blurted out the entire thing! Then they got the lawyer!
I dont think they knew she was dead till this time! Then Brian leaves and kills himself!
my god what a tragedy.
Hmm... you're right. How did they know for sure she was dead already by the 30th when he used her card? I mean, it all seems pretty obvious with her body location and his travel days, but she was only found 3 days before that attest warrant was filed. Do they need more than circumstantial evidence to get an arrest warrant?I asked a similar question in another forum and it was explained by a purported lawyer that it was probably much simpler to indict for the unauthorized use of the bank card because BL was unambiguously unauthorized to use her card after her death (and they must have had good evidence she was dead when it was used.) But it is a grayer area to prove he was unauthorized to use a vehicle that he had up to then been able to use. My understanding is that it was just a surer bet to get the bank fraud indictment so that is probably why they went with that. IANAL - this is just my recollection of the explanation. MOO
EDIT - this is how I thought of it at the time that made sense to me: my father's car is registered in his name alone and he owns it himself. However, he lets my daughter use his car. If he were to die, but my daughter were still driving the car, it would not be considered theft or even necessarily unauthorized use. It would have to be proven that he revoked permission for her to use the car before his death. And this is why it is a gray area.
The problem here is it was.ok for him.to.drive the van before all this happened! Dads very angry I can understandRSBM
Transcript of Joe Petito’s comments in his 28.46 min. interview with Dr Phil.
“It’s not even his van. … First of all you [BL] came home without her and you had the van 10 days in your driveway. So now I’ve got:
What happened with the van? Did you clean it? Did your parents help you clean it?
Did they help cover up a crime, you know, after the fact? ...
You stole a car over, over – across how many states? You know, can you be arrested for that?
…
The problem with that is, that van was Gabby’s. So he could leave that van right there. I’m jumping on a plane. Tell me where she’s at. I’ll be there in a few hours. If I’ve got to get a private plane, I will do that right this second. I don’t care what it takes. So he better walk his little behind over to somewhere else and figure out how he’s gonna get home to his parents, ‘cause that van is in her name, not the other way around."
If various posters proposed 1-4 in your quote, they're only speculating. The only way the Ls could believe they both owned the van was if either/both told them so, and that is completely contrary to what JP said above.
I honestly don't think the L's were in on a scheme. Now knowing as much as we do, it's likely BL lied about Gabby's absence when returning home. He most likely lied to his parent's all the time, jmo.
Would you really think this immature guy would come clean and tell his parent's he just killed his girlfriend? If I killed someone, I'd keep my mouth shut.
Based on where Gabby's body was found, I think BL was hoping it would never be found, so discussing it with anyone wouldn't be in his best interest.
Technically he would have been suspect #1 one for his entire life without ever being charged because there was no body and little to no evidence for a charge of murder. Gabby could have become a missing person never to be found.
BL at the very least could live with that and he certainly wouldn't have been telling his parent's he was a killer. He really had to have had complete faith he could trust his parents and in his state of mind, I doubt he had that kind of faith.
Turns out the parent's were telling the truth about where BL was, just because they remained silent on all matters to do with Gabby being missing, they weren't silent when it came to their own child. JMO
Hmm... you're right. How did they know for sure she was dead already by the 30th when he used her card? I mean, it all seems pretty obvious with her body location and his travel days, but she was only found 3 days before that attest warrant was filed. Do they need more than circumstantial evidence to get an arrest warrant?
I haven't not seen a warrant for the van either, though it is mentioned in the search warrant for the hard drive. I would be curious to read the earlier warrant to see what basis they had for said warrant.It depends on the state. Like so many other legal issues there is not one law for the US. In some states the borrower gets the title but the lender is listed as a lienholder. When the loan is paid off, a new title is issued with the lienholder removed.
It appears in Florida the lender actually holds the title for the life of the loan.
Who Holds A Car Title In Florida?.
While GP was a missing person, it surprises me if no warrant was obtained for the van. It might not have been needed since the van was "registered" to her, but I'd still have thought one would have been obtained just in case. But I've not seen a warrant published.
JMO
Hmm... you're right. How did they know for sure she was dead already by the 30th when he used her card? I mean, it all seems pretty obvious with her body location and his travel days, but she was only found 3 days before that attest warrant was filed. Do they need more than circumstantial evidence to get an arrest warrant?
That does not negate the fact that it was said on public television.I wonder if this is the same "close friend" as the one who said he thought BL would flee to NZ?
IMO, he has about as much credibility as a dead dandelion.
Also, the article is in The Sun, a tabloid who pay for stories. Make of that what you will.
MOO