The outpour of support is awesome. Thank y'all. All of y'all (not the just the one's I "quoted" in this post) have definitely got my mind back on track. Thank you to everyone :) I appreciate it.
This is really really good advice! Thanks!
It's definitely hard not to take things personally sometimes, especially when it seems like someone is patronizing you.
But you are so right. And I love this advice. Thank you :)
Thanks, this made me feel better :)
It just seems like some people are basically calling me stupid for even questioning things that, as far as I know, have yet to be verified. That got me down a little bit.
Thanks for clarifying for me :)! So are we hoping for the possibility that he ran a red light to get more information on his whereabouts for a specific time? TIA
Regarding red light cameras...Warning: possibly stupid question
Do these cameras only go start recording when someone runs a red light (almost in the same way a motion detector camera would work)? Or are they on all the time?
I was under the impression that they just take a picture of your car...
I apologize to anyone who is offended by my posts. When it comes to this kinda stuff I don't take anything that anyone says for face value. It is my nature to question the validity of everything until I get proof.
Sorry if this way of gathering information offends you.
#FINDCHRISTINA
What I'm still questioning is
1) How does "I can't find my house key" = "I can't find my car keys"?
2) How does Jonni know that somebody took them off her keychain and hid them from her?
3) SN offered to take her home to her apartment, and she said that she was fine to drive home. Why would...
I'm really just trying to make the point that it is disputable. There is no way to PROVE that he had a bite mark on his arm. Even if there's a bite mark there's no way to PROVE that it was from christina. The point here is that without PROOF it is disputable. Just like eye-witnesses are...
I cough a lot even when I'm not sick... just saying.
Also, he's right about the defense doing this. They would question how they could determine it's a human bite mark vs. another kind of bite mark, like a dog, etc. etc.
It's just not credible in courts.
And, it's nice to finally clarify that they were not found at the apartment afterwards, and that LE's belief that she had them in her possession was a correct assumption all along (as far as we know, especially since none of the VIs are saying otherwise :/ ).
Too bad we don't know how Jonni...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.