You certainly implied it, in my opinion. You would excuse Kat and all her lies, just to get seth, the real perpetrator in a case with no body, no cause of death, and a sociopath as the star witness.
Wow, I'm kind of surprised that some of you see Kat as a victim!
And to be clear, I'm not defending seth's role in this. But if I were on the jury, I would disregard all of Kat's testimony and demand the state prove their case.
Relying on an admitted liar who received a sweet deal isn't...
but Scarlett! They weren't kids! One was like 20 years old! or something. And after Dunn shot at the suv, the black kids left the scene! Both parties must be guilty of something, no?
FFS! Put aside the fact that the racist, lying Michael Dunn, is the one on trial for murder, and the evidence...
Thanks, gxm. Imo, that was a dereliction of duty on the part of the prosecution team. jmo, and all that. Sometimes you have to sink down to Strolla level nonsense, sympathetic witness or not, to convict the killer. What a shame.
What happened? Was there any re direct? My feed cut out for a short period of time. When it re loaded, there was a new witness. needless to say, I am disappointed.....but I'm not sure why!
I understand she would have to take the stand or suffer some remedy, I should have been clearer. I hope the prosecutors call her as a witness.
I watched her police interview and the video from inside the gas station. imo, she was simply an innocent bystander. This is all on Dunn.
Thank you both for refreshing my memory, counselors. :) I have edited my post accordingly.
nightwatch, I think it would have been more unlikely Dunn was under imminent threat in that scenario. The Durango was higher, and it was a "rifle" after all. Unless the shot/s were going to come with...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.