Recent content by aa9511

The scary part is that if the DNA actually matched to someone, that person would have been charged and given the death penalty long ago. Maybe even executed by now. When it was probably just the underwear factory worker. The jury would have said, DNA is proof.

From what I saw, Burke seems mentally ill/sociopathic, etc..

If he's mentally ill, would he be aware of how he is coming across to others? I think maybe it's a thing of, he doesn't even realize it. He seems mentally ill to me.

I don't think it was the father, I think it was the son because as everyone can see, he is a little off.

The scary thing is that what if that DNA actually connected to someone in the computer. I am sure they would QUICKLY have charged that person to get the attention off of the Ramseys, and you know what that person would have probably been convicted and maybe even death penalty. The jury would...

Didn't it come out on Dr. Phil that he never goes out anyway? He basically stays at home all day?

I haven't followed the case that closely, but that ransom note is so bogus. Obviously made up. Then you have the fact that Burke is strange, that the window or whatever seemed staged, that who would risk doing all of that in that house, etc.. I always thought it was Burke even though I didn't...

I have only been following this on the TV. As far as Rahm Emanuel, so for the settlement with the family, would he be aware of that? I guess so. I don't know who takes care of the settlements. I tend to think that the person at the top can't possibly be aware of every single thing...

Does anyone know how I can get to the Freddie Gray trial forum in here? I tried the "search" but it's pulling up old threads.

Thank you! Like a laptop bag or was it a duffel bag or something? TIA.

Hi everyone. Has it been determined yet why the suspects didn't steal thiings from the Blackburn home (besides ATM card)? Like Tv's and stuff.

<modsnip> That makes sense. Now this other story seems very risky. If they were raping the woman, that means they would know beforehand that they had to kill her. If they didn't mean to kill her, they would have gone in wearing coverings on their face. It just isn't adding up.

I think they will still get a conviction, based on comments I've seen across the web (not on here). People want to see someone pay for his, and here come some **** gang members who have done burglaries. Their mind want to connect the two, because it's human nature that people want to make...

Yes of course they would have terrible things on social media since they are gang members. That doesn't mean they carried out this specific crime. Those are two unrelated things. Let's see what the police have. Yes they are horrible people so why didn't they kill or harm the toddler as well?

Is Nancy Grace following this case?