If the cops are crooked enough to plant evidence how can trust anything in the whole case? What makes you think he was guilty if there is no honest evidence?
New trial? Yes but only after a new investigation! The defence makes it look like someone else is possibly guilty but wasn't investigated properly.
I lean towards the innocence of SA, but WHY is the police framing him? WHY are they protecting the real killer? I haven't heard a reason or...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.