FWIW- Eckhart was an alternate & not part of deliberations, so this "agreement" was made sometime during sequestration or after the entire panel was excused. MOO- there was a LOT of discussion during sequestration that was related to the trial.
Disney owns ABC television. ABC television is guilty of "buying" this juror's interview, as well as many the money paid in "licensing fees" to the Anthony family and the infamous picture of the snake.
I'm a newbie and certainly not a legal brain, but what is the difference between the jury looking at a photo of say blood spatter evidence coupled with testimony from a blood spatter expert and a can of "odor" coupled with an odor experts testimony? Or even hearing a recording that is verified...