Recent content by Celeskitty

Doesn't look like there will be a live stream.

It's not so much a convicted murderer for me to trust the cellmate's words, but that Arias is a proven pathological liar. I have been around people with mental issues, they have been open and honest when I've talked to them.

I like this show. The narrarator can be pretty snarky at times. It is pretty straight forward, there's no official interviewer like Dateline has.

Is this the cellmate that was fighting with her and she claimed self-defense?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thanksgiving_%28United_States%29#Thanksgiving_dates.2C_2013.E2.80.932022 It's usually the fourth Thursday in November, there are exceptions. It was set by Congress back in the 40s.

Thanksgiving is on November 28th. Just wanted to pass that along.

Honestly, I would consider breaking the law higher on my "get rid of the guy" list than 🤬🤬🤬🤬 but that's just me. I still tease my husband and ask where's his 🤬🤬🤬🤬 stash on his computer. As far as I know, he doesn't have one.

She forgave him for a lot of things. Early into their marriage he went to jail for fraud and she stayed. I think the 🤬🤬🤬🤬 has something to do with their religion. It might not seem a big deal for some but others it's a big taboo.

Nitpicking at exact phone times, whether it was two minutes or seven.. if I was on this jury I would be irritated.

There are many reasons. He wanted sympathy from everyone, he wanted to make sure to give the impression to everyone that he was too weak to lift Michele out of the bathtub (which is why he was sending his daughter out for neighbors to assist him). Sometimes when people like him commit crimes...

If I remember correctly, they stole the name from one of his adopted kids (identify theft). He took her back to the country she was born in and left her there. He took her passport and she had to enter that country's foster care. I think he figured he could use her social security number and...

He's not a real doctor anyway.

Very nice.. he agreed with the wording the judge made to the jury, then motioned for a mistrial based on what she said to the jury. He made Nurmi proud today.

The first question was clarification of "abiding conviction of guilt." The second question is that should the statute be taken literally that Ms. Mee is a principal or is it principle? in the robbery. The judge is saying that the law should be taken literally. The problem I think the jury is...

They asked about a legal definition, which the judge says that there will be no further explanation other than what's been given to them. The foreman also said as they made their way out that they might have another question so stand by.