I hope that this comment will be further pursued. It seems striking that the shooter must have known the exact movements and timing of BT that morning. I have not heard this mentioned in media reports either.
If this is a voluntary disappearance, then what would have been his logic for disposing of the laptop in the river as opposed to just taking it with him to someplace far away?
The witnesses Burger/Johnson reported intermingled screams and gunshots with screams fading out right after last gun shot. There is no testimony that new screams were initiated after the last gunshot. Gunshot sounds and screams may travel differently and Burger/Johnson were a ways away.
I recall sometime back on WS, someone saying that it was testified that these tiles were taken off in process of removing door. However, I myself did not read or hear that item of testimony.
I was just about to post the same observation. Door cracks and bat marks are two different things. Plausible that one bat crack created the small opening that made it possible to pull and crack door panels later.
I went back to the testimony and read that they were unable to identify an object that would make the scratchs and indentations in the steel plate. So that is likely why they did not pursue it.
All this cricket bat discussion reminded me about the bashed up metal bath panel. I do not recall it being mentioned in Nel's cross of Oscar. What do you think? Was it an oversight?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.