Recent content by follower

  1. F

    CO - Jessica Ridgeway, 10, Westminster, 5 Oct 2012 - #11

    I am going to need a pointer tool or something on this one. I can't make out any of what you are saying. Can you describe exactly where you see that? I thought the sheet made viewing the remains impossible while the brown backboard/stretcher thing is viewable. The remains would be in...
  2. F

    CO - Jessica Ridgeway, 10, Westminster, 5 Oct 2012 - #11

    What is your understanding of the term as LE used it in this case? I think that would help my thoughts move either in favor of a perp known to Jessica or a random perp.
  3. F

    CO - Jessica Ridgeway, 10, Westminster, 5 Oct 2012 - #11

    I can totally follow your thought on this. However, I got the impression that the remains specifically? purposely? did not include identifiable remains. (except with DNA) I don't think that has been confirmed by LE so it could be just my interpretation.
  4. F

    CO - Jessica Ridgeway, 10, Westminster, 5 Oct 2012 - #11

    This is what I was trying to get at. Thank you for wording it better. WHY would the suspect deem it necessary to hide Jessica's identity or WHO could the suspect be that he would deem it necessary?
  5. F

    CO - Jessica Ridgeway, 10, Westminster, 5 Oct 2012 - #11

    Is anyone familiar with other serial predators that attempted to hide the victim identities? Concealing identification to me does not seem like a random serial. Why would it matter to the suspect if the victim was easily identified? The only reason I could think of would be to delay the...
  6. F

    GUILTY MT - Sherry Arnold, 43, Sidney, 7 Jan 2012 - #4

    I'm not sure if this has already been posted but this is a quote from a family member's website: "For several days there was no sign of Sherry. On the seventh day, a tip was received on the FBI’s tip line that led to the arrest of two men, one in North Dakota and one in South Dakota. One...
  7. F

    Interview with the two boys has been cancelled

    I'm sure this question has been asked and answered, but in all my attempts to find the answer and browse the forums, I still cannot find it. WHY can't the police interview the boys without the parents' permission? Is there no legal means to do so? TIA.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
192
Guests online
791
Total visitors
983

Forum statistics

Threads
625,952
Messages
18,514,707
Members
240,887
Latest member
dllanas
Back
Top