Recent content by fridaybaker

Katt, I agree that the press like to associate them with the Trumps to smear the Trumps, while ignoring the fact they did business and rubbed shoulders with a lot of the uber wealthy. Despite that bias in reporting however, the Alexanders were at the White House and at Mar a Lago on numerous...

Of course... https://www.dailymail.co.uk/crime-desk/article-15675549/Alexander-brothers-trump-pardon-sex-trafficking-conviction.html

I'm quite sure that there are legions of foul persons who have been granted clemency by many presidents. It's a tradition. But money talks and, in this case, there will be a LOT of money. The parents originally offered up to a BILLION dollars in bail. What drives me crazy in cases like these is...

I've changed my mind about this case as it's gone on with nothing found of Paul for so long. I'm inclined to think that Paul went into the river and, most likely, intentionally. Very sad, if true. There just doesn't seem to be any indication of foul play.

Can’t read this as it’s behind a paywall for me, but I read somewhere that the charges in Florida are actually federal charges as well. If that’s true, then it’s no firewall against a pardon. Stay tuned to January 2029 my friend.

The family has been working to protect assets since the day they were arrested, imo.

Not so fast. There WILL be a pardon. MOO.

And seem out-of-sync with the man himself. IMO.

Great points. However, I think he’s arid that the tattoo is on the underside of the wrist.

Yes. My assessment of the sheriff is that he used hyperbole a lot. I think he also talks in “casual mode” quite a bit, wherein he might say that a person is”cleared”, when formally they really aren’t cleared. They just aren’t looking at them right now. It’s confusing and, I agree, in this case...

My interpretation is that the backpack was a “new” release from Walmart, but I may be mistaken. (Meaning that version hadn’t been out long.)

Not sure I understand, but I think you're asking about my question mark. Upthread, posters were implying that the location that was searched with the sniffer was close to the original SWAT operation. If they didn't find anything, though, does it still indicate anything about that original SWAT...

Okay. I'm still not understanding. The OP seemed to narrow down the possible choppers being used for the sniffer to only those counties who had their own choppers. Couldn't a county who didn't have their own borrow another county's chopper to use with the sniffer? Please excuse me and just move...

But, apparently, they found nothing. ?

I'm not understanding. Couldn't Santa Cruz or Graham used another county's chopper for the search?