Surely if the judge is stating that VT has added information about the flirtatious remark today in court, that sounds quite damning.
"Judge says VT made no mention of the "flirtatious remark" he claims Jo made in his signed statements. He said it in court earlier."
I find that odd for a person of sound mind.
I know we can assume that some men would try it on after ten minutes, but a man in a long term relationship who had previously never had a girlfriend? Hardly cocky lethario material is he? Another example of the facts not matching up to the picture...
Believe me.. I have first hand experience of people who can say the most heartfelt things, make you believe they are genuine. Make you feel sorry for them. Even make you like and love them. Yet their actions and doings cause hurt and pain.
What is the true test of a person is their actions...
All this .. I was waiting to be arrested, I couldn't believe what had happened, I should have phoned the police.. I had ample time. You did call the police VT, remember? You tried to pin your landlord!!!
How can he try to pretend he was so sorry? His testimony is so believable and so...
I agree it all sounds extremely plausible, apart from the 'stumbling upon' a quarry and her chest being exposed 'through moving her'
I think that there was intent to murder her. To lean in to kiss her after ten minutes he must have been aroused and I suspect as soon as she screamed (and I...
I find it totally implausable.
If someone made a pass at me after I'd invited them in for a Christmas 'hello' and they then put their arm around me and leant in to kiss me I would either fly up from the sofa or turn away and uncomfortably say 'no thanks!'
I wouldn't scream... unless I already...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.